Literature DB >> 18324785

Screening of 397 chemicals and development of a quantitative structure--activity relationship model for androgen receptor antagonism.

Anne Marie Vinggaard1, Jay Niemelä, Eva Bay Wedebye, Gunde Egeskov Jensen.   

Abstract

We have screened 397 chemicals for human androgen receptor (AR) antagonism by a sensitive reporter gene assay to generate data for the development of a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. A total of 523 chemicals comprising data on 292 chemicals from our laboratory and data on 231 chemicals from the literature constituted the training set for the model. The chemicals were selected with the purpose of representing a wide range of chemical structures (e.g., organochlorines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) and various functions (e.g., natural hormones, pesticides, plastizicers, plastic additives, brominated flame retardants, and roast mutagens). In addition, the intention was to obtain an equal number of positive and negative chemicals. Among our own data for the training set, 45.7% exhibited inhibitory activity against the transcriptional activity induced by the synthetic androgen R1881. The MultiCASE expert system was used to construct a QSAR model for AR antagonizing potential. A "5 Times, 2-Fold 50% Cross Validation" of the model showed a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 84%, and a concordance of 76%. Data for 102 chemicals were generated for an external validation of the model resulting in a sensitivity of 57%, a specificity of 98%, and a concordance of 92% of the model. The model was run on a set of 176103 chemicals, and 47% were within the domain of the model. Approximately 8% of chemicals was predicted active for AR antagonism. We conclude that the predictability of the global QSAR model for this end point is good. This most comprehensive QSAR model may become a valuable tool for screening large numbers of chemicals for AR antagonism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324785     DOI: 10.1021/tx7002382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  21 in total

Review 1.  Disruption of androgen receptor signaling in males by environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Doug C Luccio-Camelo; Gail S Prins
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.292

2.  High-Content Analysis Provides Mechanistic Insights into the Testicular Toxicity of Bisphenol A and Selected Analogues in Mouse Spermatogonial Cells.

Authors:  Shenxuan Liang; Lei Yin; Kevin Shengyang Yu; Marie-Claude Hofmann; Xiaozhong Yu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Polyester monomers lack ability to bind and activate both androgenic and estrogenic receptors as determined by in vitro and in silico methods.

Authors:  Thomas G Osimitz; William J Welsh; Ni Ai; Colleen Toole
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  In Silico Prediction of Physicochemical Properties of Environmental Chemicals Using Molecular Fingerprints and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; Kamel Mansouri; Antony J Williams; Richard S Judson; David G Allen; Warren M Casey; Nicole C Kleinstreuer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Agrochemicals and obesity.

Authors:  Xiao-Min Ren; Yun Kuo; Bruce Blumberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.102

6.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Longer-term and short-term variability in pollution of fluvial sediments by dioxin-like and endocrine disruptive compounds.

Authors:  P Macikova; T Kalabova; J Klanova; P Kukucka; J P Giesy; K Hilscherova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Bisphenol A affects androgen receptor function via multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  Christina Teng; Bonnie Goodwin; Keith Shockley; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; John Norris; B Alex Merrick; Anton M Jetten; Christopher P Austin; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.192

10.  Combined Naïve Bayesian, Chemical Fingerprints and Molecular Docking Classifiers to Model and Predict Androgen Receptor Binding Data for Environmentally- and Health-Sensitive Substances.

Authors:  Alfonso T García-Sosa; Uko Maran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.