Literature DB >> 1832380

Risk of vertebral insufficiency fractures in relation to compressive strength predicted by quantitative computed tomography.

M Biggemann1, D Hilweg, S Seidel, M Horst, P Brinckmann.   

Abstract

Vertebral insufficiency fractures may result from excessive loading of normal and routine loading of osteoporotic spines. Fracture occurs when the mechanical load exceeds the vertebral compressive strength, i.e., the maximum load a vertebra can tolerate. Vertebral compressive strength is determined by trabecular bone density and the size of endplate area. Both parameters can be measured non-invasively by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). In 75 patients compressive strength (i.e., trabecular bone density and endplate area) of the vertebra L3 was determined using QCT. In addition, conventional radiographs of the spines were analysed for the prevalence of insufficiency fractures in each case. By relating fracture prevalence to strength, three fracture risk groups were found: a high-risk group with strength values of L3 less than 3 kN (kilo Newton) and a fracture risk of 100%, an intermediate group with strength values from 3 to 5 kN and a steeply increasing risk with decreasing strength, and a low-risk group with strength values greater than 5 kN and a fracture risk near 0%. Biomechanical measurements and model calculations indicate that spinal loads of 3 to 4 kN at L3/4 will be common in everyday activities. These data and the results described above suggest that spines with strength values of L3 less than 3 kN are at an extremely high risk of insufficiency fractures in daily life. Advantages of fracture risk assessment by strength determination over risk estimation based on clinically used trabecular bone density measurements are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1832380     DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(91)90047-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  CT image analysis of the vertebral trabecular network in vivo.

Authors:  F Chevalier; A M Laval-Jeantet; M Laval-Jeantet; C Bergot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  The Effect of Quantitative Computed Tomography Acquisition Protocols on Bone Mineral Density Estimation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Paul M Huddleston; Jon J Camp; Kai-Nan An; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT measured subchondral bone density.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Ordway; Yen-Mou Lu; Xingkai Zhang; Chin-Chang Cheng; Huang Fang; Amir H Fayyazi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Bone mass and beyond: risk factors for fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Methods of predicting vertebral body fractures of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Gurudattsingh B Sisodia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

6.  Extended compilation of autopsy-material measurements on lumbar ultimate compressive strength for deriving reference values in ergonomic work design: The Revised Dortmund Recommendations.

Authors:  Matthias Jäger
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.068

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.