Literature DB >> 8275367

Bone mass and beyond: risk factors for fractures.

P D Ross1, J W Davis, R D Wasnich.   

Abstract

Numerous prospective studies have demonstrated a strong relationship between bone mass and fracture risk. The fact that the bone mass distributions of fracture and nonfracture cases overlap does not necessarily indicate a shortcoming of bone mass, but might instead be due to the sporadic nature of falls and the influence of other fracture risk factors. The recent finding that prevalent fractures are strong predictors of fracture risk, independent of bone mass, suggests (but does not prove) that there may be other, potentially measurable fracture risk factors that complement, and act independently of, bone mass. This paper reviews possible mechanisms by which prevalent fractures might serve as etiologic risk factors, or as surrogate indicators of other risk factors. Potential risk factors other than bone mass and prevalent fractures are also considered. Whether or not etiologic fracture risk factors other than bone mass can be identified, it appears that treatments that influence bone will be most effective if begun early, before bone strength becomes impaired and fractures begin to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275367     DOI: 10.1007/bf01673422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  20 in total

1.  The origins of epidemiologic studies of heart disease, cancer and osteoporosis among Hawaii Japanese.

Authors:  L K Heilbrun; A Kagan; A Nomura; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  1985-08

2.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  The success and failure of the adaptive response to functional load-bearing in averting bone fracture.

Authors:  L E Lanyon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women.

Authors:  P D Ross; H K Genant; J W Davis; P D Miller; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A stochastic model of age-related bone loss and fractures.

Authors:  A Horsman; D H Marshall; M Peacock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Risk of vertebral insufficiency fractures in relation to compressive strength predicted by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M Biggemann; D Hilweg; S Seidel; M Horst; P Brinckmann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Peak bone mass, bone loss and risk of fracture.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.