Literature DB >> 18318622

On the decline of 1st and 2nd order sensitivity with eccentricity.

Robert F Hess1, Daniel H Baker, Keith A May, Jian Wang.   

Abstract

We studied the relationship between the decline in sensitivity that occurs with eccentricity for stimuli of different spatial scale defined by either luminance (LM) or contrast (CM) modulation. We show that the detectability of CM stimuli declines with eccentricity in a spatial frequency-dependent manner, and that the rate of sensitivity decline for CM stimuli is roughly that expected from their 1st order carriers, except, possibly, at finer scales. Using an equivalent noise paradigm, we investigated the possible reasons for why the foveal sensitivity for detecting LM and CM stimuli differs as well as the reason why the detectability of 1st order stimuli declines with eccentricity. We show the former can be modeled by an increase in internal noise whereas the latter involves both an increase in internal noise and a loss of efficiency. To encompass both the threshold and suprathreshold transfer properties of peripheral vision, we propose a model in terms of the contrast gain of the underlying mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18318622     DOI: 10.1167/8.1.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Exogenous attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Michael S Landy; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Attention alters spatial resolution by modulating second-order processing.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attention Modifies Spatial Resolution According to Task Demands.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01-01

4.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Searchers adjust their eye-movement dynamics to target characteristics in natural scenes.

Authors:  Lars O M Rothkegel; Heiko H Schütt; Hans A Trukenbrod; Felix A Wichmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Daniel H Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Broadband noise masks suppress neural responses to narrowband stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Greta Vilidaitė
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-15

8.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.