Literature DB >> 18317397

Otologics fully implantable hearing system: Phase I trial 1-year results.

Herman A Jenkins1, James S Atkins, Drew Horlbeck, Michael E Hoffer, Ben Balough, George Alexiades, William Garvis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of the Otologics fully implantable hearing system after 1 year of use in a Phase I clinical trial. STUDY
DESIGN: Repeated-measures within-subjects design.
SETTING: Procedures were performed in a variety of facilities, including a university, military, and private hospital's ambulatory surgical center and outpatient clinical audiologic test facilities. PATIENTS: Adult patients with bilateral moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. INTERVENTION(S): Surgical insertion of this prosthesis included an atticotomy to expose the incus, securing the transducer to the mastoid bone, attaching the transducer tip to the incus via insertion into a laser-drilled hole, and postauricular implantation of the microphone/battery/electronics capsule. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subjective patient benefit, aided sound field thresholds, and speech discrimination with the subject's own, appropriately fit, walk-in hearing aid(s) and the prosthesis were assessed.
RESULTS: There were no pre-post-implant differences noted for bone conduction: slight differences were noted in the pre-post-implant air conduction results (p < 0.05). These differences were attributed to the healing process and reversed to almost preimplant assessment levels by the third-month evaluation. Pure-tone averages and monaural word recognition scores were slightly better for the walk-in-aided condition (p < 0.05), whereas the patient benefit scales favored the postoperative implant-aided conditions.Adverse effects of the implant were encountered on 14 occasions after the implantation of the 20 subjects. With the exception of partial device extrusions (that occurred later), all were rectified by the time of initial activation. At the 12-month data collection point, problems that had been encountered by subjects included 1) partial device extrusion (3 subjects), necessitating explantation in 2; 2) loss of external communication (2 subjects), resulting in 1 explantation; and 3) increased charging times beyond 1.5 hours (7), resulting in 3 explantations and 2 patients not using their device while awaiting explantation.
CONCLUSION: Phase I trial results provide evidence that this fully implantable device can provide sound amplification to sensorineural hearing loss patients, with performance results similar to the patients' walk-in hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317397     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181656969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  13 in total

1.  Controlling the position and the dislocation of the middle ear transducer with high-resolution computed tomography and digital volume tomography: implications for the transducers' design.

Authors:  Georgios Kontorinis; Anja M Giesemann; Thomas Witt; Friedrich Goetz; Burkard Schwab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  [Implantable hearing aids].

Authors:  J C Luers; D Beutner; K-B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Round window membrane implantation with an active middle ear implant: a study of the effects on the performance of round window exposure and transducer tip diameter in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Kanthaiah Koka; Arnaud Deveze; N Julian Holland; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Totally implantable hearing aid surgical technique and the first Indian experience with Envoy esteem.

Authors:  Sathiya Murali; P Vijaya Krishnan; Tanmay Bansal; K Karthikeyan; Kiran Natarajan; Mohan Kameswaran
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-09-27

5.  Fully implantable Otologics MET Carina device for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Preliminary surgical and clinical results.

Authors:  L Bruschini; F Forli; A Santoro; P Bruschini; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  The first results of a totally implanted active middle ear device.

Authors:  Maria da Conceição Peixoto; Cristina Miranda; Mafalda Bento; Susana Oliveira; Rui Pratas; Victor Correia da Silva
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Review of Patient Characteristics and Surgical Aspects versus the Long-Term Outcomes for Recipients of a Fully Implantable Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Philippe P Lefebvre; Javier Gisbert; Domenico Cuda; Stéphane Tringali; Arnaud Deveze
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 8.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  [Fully implantable hearing systems].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  First bilateral simultaneous implantation with fully implantable middle ear hearing device.

Authors:  Magdalena Lachowska; Kazimierz Niemczyk; Alain Yazbeck; Krzysztof Morawski; Antoni Bruzgielewicz
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.