Literature DB >> 18317330

Stereoacuity testability in African-American and Hispanic pre-school children.

Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch1, Jesse Lin, Jennifer Deneen, Susan A Cotter, Stanley P Azen, Mark S Borchert, Ying Wang, Rohit Varma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine testability using the Randot Pre-school Stereoacuity Test in black and Hispanic children 30 to 72 months of age.
METHODS: A population-based cohort of children 30 to 72 months of age was administered the Randot Pre-school Stereoacuity Test, with presenting refractive correction, and before cover testing, visual acuity testing, or refraction. Children who could not point to specified two-dimensional demonstration pictures, and children who would not try to name or match random dot figures to the corresponding two-dimensional pictures, were classified as unable to perform the test. Children who were able to perform the task but could not correctly identify at least two 800-arcsecond random dot figures were classified as having no stereopsis, and were retested by another examiner.
RESULTS: Stereoacuity testing was attempted in 1662 Hispanic and 1470 black children. Overall, 80% of children were able to be tested; 33% of children 30 to 36 months of age, 73% of children 37 to 48 months of age, 96% of children 49 to 60 months of age, and 98% of children 61 to 72 months of age were testable. Older children were significantly more likely to complete testing successfully than younger children (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age, there was no significant ethnicity-related difference in testability (p = 0.19); however, there was a small but significant gender-related difference (p = 0.0002) with more girls (82%) than boys (77%) able to complete testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Eighty percent of children aged 30 to 72 months can be tested using the Randot Pre-school Stereoacuity test. Testability increases steadily with age, and 97% of children over 48 months of age can complete the test. Testability does not differ between children of Hispanic and black ethnicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18317330     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181643ea7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Sheima Rafiq; Jess Hugill; Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Adam O'Neill; Vicente Puyat; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Stereoacuity of preschool children with and without vision disorders.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Visual acuity norms in pre-school children: the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  Ying Pan; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Susan A Cotter; Ge Wen; Mark S Borchert; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Percentile curves of stereacuity in a Spanish paediatric population.

Authors:  Borja Navas-Navia; Laura Garcia-Montero; Belén Pérez-Sanchez; Clara Martínez-Pérez; César Villa-Collar
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-11-26

5.  Eye examination testability in children with autism and in typical peers.

Authors:  Rachel Anastasia Coulter; Annette Bade; Yin Tea; Gregory Fecho; Deborah Amster; Erin Jenewein; Jacqueline Rodena; Kara Kelley Lyons; G Lynn Mitchell; Nicole Quint; Sandra Dunbar; Michele Ricamato; Jennie Trocchio; Bonnie Kabat; Chantel Garcia; Irina Radik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Portela-Camino; Santiago Martín-González; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 7.  Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Laurence P Tidbury
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.