BACKGROUND: The three-dimensional relationships of the bones in the foot in a flatfoot deformity are difficult to assess with standard radiographs. CT scans demonstrate these relationships but are typically made in a nonweightbearing mode. Our objective was to assess the use of a weightbearing CT apparatus to image the feet in patients with severe flexible pes planus deformities and to better define the anatomical changes that occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A specialized device was designed and constructed to simulate weightbearing to the feet during CT examination. Eighteen normal feet and 30 painful severe and flexible pes planus feet were imaged in both the non weightbearing and weightbearing states, set at 50% of body weight. Several measurements of intertarsal relationships were made of the pes planus and normal feet. Navicular floor to skin distance, forefoot arch angle, and subtalar joint subluxation were measured in the coronal plane in both the weightbearing and nonweightbearing states. T-tests were used to analyze measurements of navicular floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. RESULTS: The weightbearing device had a significant effect on foot configuration for both normal and pes planus feet (p = 0.0008) and (p < 0.0001) respectively for both floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. There was a significant difference between normal feet and pes planus feet with regard to the forefoot arch angle in the nonweightbearing (p = 0.02) and weightbearing states (p = 0.01). Four of the pes planus patients had evidence of subtalar joint subluxation which was more pronounced in the weightbearing state. There was no significant difference between the navicular floor to skin distance in the normal versus pes planus feet in either the non weightbearing (p = 0.05) or the weightbearing states (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: A device was designed and constructed to apply a weightbearing load equal to that of 50% body weight with minimal to no patient discomfort. The resultant effects on foot configuration were significant, and are useful for assessment of degree of flexible flat foot deformity, thus guiding clinical management. The measure which most significantly differed between pes planus patients and normal volunteers was the forefoot arch angle. Forefoot arch angle may therefore be the most useful measure for the imaging diagnosis of flexible pes planus, and the degree of planus deformity.
BACKGROUND: The three-dimensional relationships of the bones in the foot in a flatfoot deformity are difficult to assess with standard radiographs. CT scans demonstrate these relationships but are typically made in a nonweightbearing mode. Our objective was to assess the use of a weightbearing CT apparatus to image the feet in patients with severe flexible pes planus deformities and to better define the anatomical changes that occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A specialized device was designed and constructed to simulate weightbearing to the feet during CT examination. Eighteen normal feet and 30 painful severe and flexible pes planus feet were imaged in both the non weightbearing and weightbearing states, set at 50% of body weight. Several measurements of intertarsal relationships were made of the pes planus and normal feet. Navicular floor to skin distance, forefoot arch angle, and subtalar joint subluxation were measured in the coronal plane in both the weightbearing and nonweightbearing states. T-tests were used to analyze measurements of navicular floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. RESULTS: The weightbearing device had a significant effect on foot configuration for both normal and pes planus feet (p = 0.0008) and (p < 0.0001) respectively for both floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. There was a significant difference between normal feet and pes planus feet with regard to the forefoot arch angle in the nonweightbearing (p = 0.02) and weightbearing states (p = 0.01). Four of the pes planus patients had evidence of subtalar joint subluxation which was more pronounced in the weightbearing state. There was no significant difference between the navicular floor to skin distance in the normal versus pes planus feet in either the non weightbearing (p = 0.05) or the weightbearing states (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: A device was designed and constructed to apply a weightbearing load equal to that of 50% body weight with minimal to no patient discomfort. The resultant effects on foot configuration were significant, and are useful for assessment of degree of flexible flat foot deformity, thus guiding clinical management. The measure which most significantly differed between pes planus patients and normal volunteers was the forefoot arch angle. Forefoot arch angle may therefore be the most useful measure for the imaging diagnosis of flexible pes planus, and the degree of planus deformity.
Authors: Anna Hirschmann; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Georg Klammer; Norman Espinosa; Florian M Buck Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eli Schmidt; Thiago Silva; Daniel Baumfeld; Kevin N Dibbern; Hee Young Lee; John Femino; Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur; Cesar de Cesar Netto Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2021
Authors: Edward O Rojas; Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur; Kevin Dibbern; Matthieu Lalevee; Elijah Auch; Eli Schmidt; Victoria Vivtcharenko; Shuyuan Li; Phinit Phisitkul; John Femino; Cesar de Cesar Netto Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2021