OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare computed tomography (CT) of the hindfoot in the supine non-weight-bearing position (NWBCT) with upright weight-bearing position (WBCT). METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent of all patients were obtained. NWBCT and WBCT scans of the ankle were obtained in 22 patients (mean age, 46.0 ± 17.1 years; range 19-75 years) using a conventional 64-row CT for NWBCT and a novel cone-beam CT for WBCT. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently performed the following measurements: the hindfoot alignment angle, fibulocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal distances, lateral talocalcaneal joint space width, talocalcaneal overlap and naviculocalcaneal distance. Significant changes between NWBCT and WBCT were sought using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for all measurements except the hindfoot alignment angle and tibiocalcaneal distance. Significant measurement results were as follows (NWBCT/WBCT reader 1; NWBCT/WBCT reader 2, mean ± standard deviation): fibulocalcaneal distance 3.6 mm ± 5.2/0.3 mm ± 6.0 (P = 0.006); 1.4 mm ± 6.3/-1.1 mm ± 6.3 (P = 0.002), lateral talocalcaneal joint space width 2.9 mm ± 1.7/2.2 mm ± 1.1 (P = 0.005); 3.4 mm ± 1.9/2.4 mm ± 1.3 (P = 0.001), talocalcaneal overlap 4.1 mm ± 3.9/1.4 mm ± 3.9 (P = 0.001); 4.5 mm ± 4.3/1.4 mm ± 3.7 (P < 0.001) and naviculocalcaneal distance 13.5 mm ± 4.0/15.3 mm ± 4.7 (P = 0.037); 14.0 mm ± 4.4/15.7 mm ± 6.2 (P = 0.100). Interreader agreement was good to excellent (ICC 0.48-0.94). CONCLUSION: Alignment of the hindfoot significantly changes in the upright weight-bearing CT position. Differences can be visualised and measured using WBCT. KEY POINTS: • Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers new opportunities for musculoskeletal problems • Visualization and quantification of hindfoot alignment are possible in upright weight-bearing CBCT • Hindfoot alignment changes significantly from non-weight-bearing to weight-bearing CT • The weight-bearing position leads to a decrease in the fibulocalcaneal distance and talocalcaneal overlap • The naviculocalcaneal distance is increased in the weight-bearing position.
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare computed tomography (CT) of the hindfoot in the supine non-weight-bearing position (NWBCT) with upright weight-bearing position (WBCT). METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent of all patients were obtained. NWBCT and WBCT scans of the ankle were obtained in 22 patients (mean age, 46.0 ± 17.1 years; range 19-75 years) using a conventional 64-row CT for NWBCT and a novel cone-beam CT for WBCT. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently performed the following measurements: the hindfoot alignment angle, fibulocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal distances, lateral talocalcaneal joint space width, talocalcaneal overlap and naviculocalcaneal distance. Significant changes between NWBCT and WBCT were sought using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for all measurements except the hindfoot alignment angle and tibiocalcaneal distance. Significant measurement results were as follows (NWBCT/WBCT reader 1; NWBCT/WBCT reader 2, mean ± standard deviation): fibulocalcaneal distance 3.6 mm ± 5.2/0.3 mm ± 6.0 (P = 0.006); 1.4 mm ± 6.3/-1.1 mm ± 6.3 (P = 0.002), lateral talocalcaneal joint space width 2.9 mm ± 1.7/2.2 mm ± 1.1 (P = 0.005); 3.4 mm ± 1.9/2.4 mm ± 1.3 (P = 0.001), talocalcaneal overlap 4.1 mm ± 3.9/1.4 mm ± 3.9 (P = 0.001); 4.5 mm ± 4.3/1.4 mm ± 3.7 (P < 0.001) and naviculocalcaneal distance 13.5 mm ± 4.0/15.3 mm ± 4.7 (P = 0.037); 14.0 mm ± 4.4/15.7 mm ± 6.2 (P = 0.100). Interreader agreement was good to excellent (ICC 0.48-0.94). CONCLUSION: Alignment of the hindfoot significantly changes in the upright weight-bearing CT position. Differences can be visualised and measured using WBCT. KEY POINTS: • Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers new opportunities for musculoskeletal problems • Visualization and quantification of hindfoot alignment are possible in upright weight-bearing CBCT • Hindfoot alignment changes significantly from non-weight-bearing to weight-bearing CT • The weight-bearing position leads to a decrease in the fibulocalcaneal distance and talocalcaneal overlap • The naviculocalcaneal distance is increased in the weight-bearing position.
Authors: Seppo K Koskinen; Ville V Haapamäki; Jari Salo; Nina C Lindfors; Mika Kortesniemi; Lauri Seppälä; Kimmo T Mattila Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Eric S Malicky; Jay L Crary; Michael J Houghton; Julie Agel; Sigvard T Hansen; Bruce J Sangeorzan Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Scott J Ellis; Timothy Deyer; Benjamin R Williams; Joseph C Yu; Scott Lehto; Alex Maderazo; Helene Pavlov; Jonathan T Deland Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Anna Hirschmann; Florian M Buck; Ramin Herschel; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Magdalena Herbst; Frank Schebesch; Martin Berger; Jang-Hwan Choi; Rebecca Fahrig; Joachim Hornegger; Andreas Maier Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: S Demehri; A Muhit; W Zbijewski; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; N Packard; R Senn; D Yang; D Foos; G K Thawait; L M Fayad; A Chhabra; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Greg M Osgood; Gaurav K Thawait; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Delaram Shakoor; Adam Shaner; John Yorkston; Wojciech B Zbijewski; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Shadpour Demehri Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Gaurav K Thawait; Shadpour Demehri; Abdullah AlMuhit; Wojciech Zbijweski; John Yorkston; Filippo Del Grande; Bashir Zikria; John A Carrino; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 3.528