Literature DB >> 18315792

A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: opposite effects of real and illusory size.

Tzvi Ganel1, Michal Tanzer, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

The idea that there are two distinct cortical visual pathways, a dorsal action stream and a ventral perception stream, is supported by neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence. Yet there is an ongoing debate as to whether or not the action system is resistant to pictorial illusions in healthy participants. In the present study, we disentangled the effects of real and illusory object size on action and perception by pitting real size against illusory size. In our task, two objects that differed slightly in length were placed within a version of the Ponzo illusion. Even though participants erroneously perceived the physically longer object as the shorter one (or vice versa), their grasping was remarkably tuned to the real size difference between the objects. These results provide the first demonstration of a double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions and together with previous findings converge on the idea that visually guided action and visual perception make use of different metrics and frames of reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18315792     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  29 in total

1.  Rapid decrement in the effects of the Ponzo display dissociates action and perception.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Gavin Buckingham; James T Enns; Philippe A Chouinard; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Differential effects of delay upon visually and haptically guided grasping and perceptual judgments.

Authors:  Charles E Pettypiece; Jody C Culham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Catching ease influences perceived speed: evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

6.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Object complexity modulates the association between action and perception in childhood.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Jody C Culham; Gal Namdar; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-11-23

9.  Visuomotor crowding: the resolution of grasping in cluttered scenes.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; Robert B Post; David Whitney
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  A Judd illusion in far-aiming: evidence of a contribution to action by vision for perception.

Authors:  John van der Kamp; Hemke van Doorn; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.