Literature DB >> 18313071

Kinetic model for the coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and substrate protein folding and aggregation.

Riina Tehver1, D Thirumalai.   

Abstract

The bacterial chaperonin GroEL and the co-chaperonin GroES assist in the folding of a number of structurally unrelated substrate proteins (SPs). In the absence of chaperonins, SP folds by the kinetic partitioning mechanism (KPM), according to which a fraction of unfolded molecules reaches the native state directly, while the remaining fraction gets trapped in a potentially aggregation-prone misfolded state. During the catalytic reaction cycle, GroEL undergoes a series of allosteric transitions (T<-->R-->R"-->T) triggered by SP capture, ATP binding and hydrolysis, and GroES binding. We developed a general kinetic model that takes into account the coupling between the rates of the allosteric transitions and the folding and aggregation of the SP. Our model, in which the GroEL allosteric rates and SP-dependent folding and aggregation rates are independently varied without prior assumption, quantitatively fits the GroEL concentration-dependent data on the yield of native ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) as a function of time. The extracted kinetic parameters for the GroEL reaction cycle are consistent with the available values from independent experiments. In addition, we also obtained physically reasonable parameters for the kinetic steps in the reaction cycle that are difficult to measure. If experimental values for GroEL allosteric rates are used, the time-dependent changes in native-state yield at eight GroEL concentrations can be quantitatively fit using only three SP-dependent parameters. The model predicts that the differences in the efficiencies (as measured by yields of the native state) of GroEL, single-ring mutant (SR1), and variants of SR1, in the rescue of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, and Rubisco, are related to the large variations in the allosteric transition rates. We also show that GroEL/S mutants that efficiently fold one SP at the expense of all others are due to a decrease in the rate of a key step in the reaction cycle, which implies that wild-type GroEL has evolved as a compromise between generality and specificity. We predict that, under maximum loading conditions and saturating ATP concentration, the efficiency of GroEL (using parameters for Rubisco) depends predominantly on the rate of R-->R" transition, while the equilibrium constant of the T<-->R has a small effect only. Both under sub- and superstoichiometric GroEL concentrations, enhanced efficiency is achieved by rapid turnover of the reaction cycle, which is in accord with the predictions of the iterative annealing mechanism. The effects are most dramatic at substoichiometric conditions (most relevant for in vivo situations) when SP aggregation can outcompete capture of SP by chaperonins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18313071      PMCID: PMC2364733          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  45 in total

1.  Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding.

Authors:  A Brinker; G Pfeifer; M J Kerner; D J Naylor; F U Hartl; M Hayer-Hartl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Simulations of beta-hairpin folding confined to spherical pores using distributed computing.

Authors:  D K Klimov; D Newfield; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins.

Authors:  Jue D Wang; Christophe Herman; Kimberly A Tipton; Carol A Gross; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Isolation and characterisation of mutants of GroEL that are fully functional as single rings.

Authors:  Zhe Sun; David J Scott; Peter A Lund
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Reto Horst; Eric B Bertelsen; Jocelyne Fiaux; Gerhard Wider; Arthur L Horwich; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Molecular crowding enhances native state stability and refolding rates of globular proteins.

Authors:  Margaret S Cheung; Dmitri Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Allosteric regulation of chaperonins.

Authors:  Amnon Horovitz; Keith R Willison
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 8.  Molecular chaperones and protein quality control.

Authors:  Bernd Bukau; Jonathan Weissman; Arthur Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: molecular simulations.

Authors:  Fumiko Takagi; Nobuyasu Koga; Shoji Takada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Kinetic analysis of ATP-dependent inter-ring communication in GroEL.

Authors:  Amnon Amir; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  16 in total

1.  FoldEco: a model for proteostasis in E. coli.

Authors:  Evan T Powers; David L Powers; Lila M Gierasch
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Capturing the essence of folding and functions of biomolecules using coarse-grained models.

Authors:  Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Manipulation of conformational change in proteins by single-residue perturbations.

Authors:  C Atilgan; Z N Gerek; S B Ozkan; A R Atilgan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Tang; Hung-Chun Chang; Kausik Chakraborty; F Ulrich Hartl; Manajit Hayer-Hartl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Protein folding and aggregation in bacteria.

Authors:  Raimon Sabate; Natalia S de Groot; Salvador Ventura
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Is catalytic activity of chaperones a selectable trait for the emergence of heat shock response?

Authors:  Murat Çetinbaş; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Thermosensitivity of growth is determined by chaperone-mediated proteome reallocation.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Ye Gao; Nathan Mih; Edward J O'Brien; Laurence Yang; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Molecular chaperones maximize the native state yield on biological times by driving substrates out of equilibrium.

Authors:  Shaon Chakrabarti; Changbong Hyeon; Xiang Ye; George H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Signalling networks and dynamics of allosteric transitions in bacterial chaperonin GroEL: implications for iterative annealing of misfolded proteins.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; Changbong Hyeon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.