Literature DB >> 25606691

Is catalytic activity of chaperones a selectable trait for the emergence of heat shock response?

Murat Çetinbaş1, Eugene I Shakhnovich2.   

Abstract

Although heat shock response is ubiquitous in bacterial cells, the underlying physical chemistry behind heat shock response remains poorly understood. To study the response of cell populations to heat shock we employ a physics-based ab initio model of living cells where protein biophysics (i.e., folding and protein-protein interactions in crowded cellular environments) and important aspects of proteins homeostasis are coupled with realistic population dynamics simulations. By postulating a genotype-phenotype relationship we define a cell division rate in terms of functional concentrations of proteins and protein complexes, whose Boltzmann stabilities of folding and strengths of their functional interactions are exactly evaluated from their sequence information. We compare and contrast evolutionary dynamics for two models of chaperon action. In the active model, foldase chaperones function as nonequilibrium machines to accelerate the rate of protein folding. In the passive model, holdase chaperones form reversible complexes with proteins in their misfolded conformations to maintain their solubility. We find that only cells expressing foldase chaperones are capable of genuine heat shock response to the increase in the amount of unfolded proteins at elevated temperatures. In response to heat shock, cells' limited resources are redistributed differently for active and passive models. For the active model, foldase chaperones are overexpressed at the expense of downregulation of high abundance proteins, whereas for the passive model; cells react to heat shock by downregulating their high abundance proteins, as their low abundance proteins are upregulated.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25606691      PMCID: PMC4302207          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.3468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  48 in total

1.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding.

Authors:  M Shtilerman; G H Lorimer; S W Englander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Chaperone-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  A L Fink
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Eric J Deeds; Orr Ashenberg; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Molecular chaperones: assisting assembly in addition to folding.

Authors:  R John Ellis
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading.

Authors:  S Miyazawa; R L Jernigan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Simulations of chaperone-assisted folding.

Authors:  C D Sfatos; A M Gutin; V I Abkevich; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Functional interaction of cytosolic hsp70 and a DnaJ-related protein, Ydj1p, in protein translocation in vivo.

Authors:  J Becker; W Walter; W Yan; E A Craig
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  A chaperone network controls the heat shock response in E. coli.

Authors:  Eric Guisbert; Christophe Herman; Chi Zen Lu; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Positive and negative design in stability and thermal adaptation of natural proteins.

Authors:  Igor N Berezovsky; Konstantin B Zeldovich; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is Protein Folding a Thermodynamically Unfavorable, Active, Energy-Dependent Process?

Authors:  Irina Sorokina; Arcady R Mushegian; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.