Literature DB >> 18311324

Responding to the challenge of clinically relevant osteopathic research: efficacy and beyond.

John C Licciardone1.   

Abstract

The osteopathic profession has been challenged over the past decade to provide clinically relevant research. The conduct of evidence-based osteopathic research is imperative not only for scientific, economic, and professional reasons, but also to drive health care policy and clinical practice guidelines. This paper summarizes recent studies in response to the osteopathic research challenge, including clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and a systematic review and meta-analysis of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for low back pain. The concept of the OMT responder is introduced and supported with preliminary data. Within the context of a pain processing model, consideration is given to genomic (e.g., the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene) and psychological (e.g., depression and somatization) factors that are associated with pain sensitivity and pain progression, and to the role that such factors may play in screening for OMT responders. While substantial progress has been made in osteopathic research, much more needs to be done.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18311324      PMCID: PMC2084062          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2007.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Osteopath Med        ISSN: 1878-0164            Impact factor:   2.149


  24 in total

1.  The paradox of osteopathy.

Authors:  J D Howell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

Authors:  Tamar Pincus; A Kim Burton; Steve Vogel; Andy P Field
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Host-environment medicine: a primary care model for the age of genomics.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Alex Poljak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  A comparison of osteopathic spinal manipulation with standard care for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  G B Andersson; T Lucente; A M Davis; R E Kappler; J A Lipton; S Leurgans
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphisms are associated with multiple pain-evoking stimuli.

Authors:  Luda Diatchenko; Andrea G Nackley; Gary D Slade; Kanokporn Bhalang; Inna Belfer; Mitchell B Max; David Goldman; William Maixner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The prognosis of low back pain in general practice.

Authors:  H J van den Hoogen; B W Koes; W Devillé; J T van Eijk; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Genetic basis for individual variations in pain perception and the development of a chronic pain condition.

Authors:  Luda Diatchenko; Gary D Slade; Andrea G Nackley; Konakporn Bhalang; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Inna Belfer; David Goldman; Ke Xu; Svetlana A Shabalina; Dmitry Shagin; Mitchell B Max; Sergei S Makarov; William Maixner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  COMT val158met genotype affects mu-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor.

Authors:  Jon-Kar Zubieta; Mary M Heitzeg; Yolanda R Smith; Joshua A Bueller; Ke Xu; Yanjun Xu; Robert A Koeppe; Christian S Stohler; David Goldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  E Ernst; P H Canter
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time for the osteopathic profession to take the lead in musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  John C Licciardone
Journal:  Osteopath Med Prim Care       Date:  2009-07-22

2.  Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018.

Authors:  Chantal Morin; Isabelle Gaboury
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.