A J Thompson1, S C R Lummis. 1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antimalarial compounds have been previously shown to inhibit rodent nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) and 5-HT(3) receptors. Here, we extend these studies to include human 5-HT(3A), 5-HT(3AB), GABA(A) alpha1beta2, GABA(A) alpha1beta2gamma2 and GABA(C) rho1 receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the effects of quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine on the electrophysiological properties of receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. KEY RESULTS: 5-HT(3A) receptor responses were inhibited by mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine with IC(50) values of 0.66, 1.06 and 24.3 microM. At 5-HT(3AB) receptors, the potencies of mefloquine (IC(50)=2.7 microM) and quinine (15.8 microM), but not chloroquine (23.6 microM), were reduced. Mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine had higher IC(50) values at GABA(A) alpha1beta2 (98.7, 0.40 and 0.46 mM, respectively) and GABA(A) alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors (0.38, 1.69 and 0.67 mM, respectively). No effect was observed at GABA(C) rho1 receptors. At all 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors, chloroquine displayed competitive behaviour and mefloquine was non-competitive. Quinine was competitive at 5-HT(3A) and GABA(A) receptors, but non-competitive at 5-HT(3AB) receptors. Homology modelling in combination with automated docking suggested orientations of quinine and chloroquine at the GABA(A) receptor binding site. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The effects of mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine are distinct at GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, whereas their effects on 5-HT(3AB) receptors are broadly similar to those at 5-HT(3A) receptors. IC(50) values for chloroquine and mefloquine at 5-HT(3) receptors are close to therapeutic blood concentrations required for malarial treatment, suggesting that their therapeutic use could be extended to include the treatment of 5-HT(3) receptor-related disorders.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antimalarial compounds have been previously shown to inhibit rodent nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) and 5-HT(3) receptors. Here, we extend these studies to include human 5-HT(3A), 5-HT(3AB), GABA(A) alpha1beta2, GABA(A) alpha1beta2gamma2 and GABA(C) rho1 receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the effects of quinine, chloroquine and mefloquine on the electrophysiological properties of receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. KEY RESULTS: 5-HT(3A) receptor responses were inhibited by mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine with IC(50) values of 0.66, 1.06 and 24.3 microM. At 5-HT(3AB) receptors, the potencies of mefloquine (IC(50)=2.7 microM) and quinine (15.8 microM), but not chloroquine (23.6 microM), were reduced. Mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine had higher IC(50) values at GABA(A) alpha1beta2 (98.7, 0.40 and 0.46 mM, respectively) and GABA(A) alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors (0.38, 1.69 and 0.67 mM, respectively). No effect was observed at GABA(C) rho1 receptors. At all 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors, chloroquine displayed competitive behaviour and mefloquine was non-competitive. Quinine was competitive at 5-HT(3A) and GABA(A) receptors, but non-competitive at 5-HT(3AB) receptors. Homology modelling in combination with automated docking suggested orientations of quinine and chloroquine at the GABA(A) receptor binding site. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The effects of mefloquine, quinine and chloroquine are distinct at GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, whereas their effects on 5-HT(3AB) receptors are broadly similar to those at 5-HT(3A) receptors. IC(50) values for chloroquine and mefloquine at 5-HT(3) receptors are close to therapeutic blood concentrations required for malarial treatment, suggesting that their therapeutic use could be extended to include the treatment of 5-HT(3) receptor-related disorders.
Authors: Carla V Rothlin; Maria I Lioudyno; Ana F Silbering; Paola V Plazas; María E Gomez Casati; Eleonora Katz; Paul S Guth; A Belén Elgoyhen Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Andrew J Thompson; Kerry L Price; David C Reeves; S Ling Chan; P-L Chau; Sarah C R Lummis Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: E A Barnard; P Skolnick; R W Olsen; H Mohler; W Sieghart; G Biggio; C Braestrup; A N Bateson; S Z Langer Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Jimena A Ballestero; Paola V Plazas; Sebastian Kracun; María E Gómez-Casati; Julián Taranda; Carla V Rothlin; Eleonora Katz; Neil S Millar; A Belén Elgoyhen Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2005-06-13 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: G R Cutting; L Lu; B F O'Hara; L M Kasch; C Montrose-Rafizadeh; D M Donovan; S Shimada; S E Antonarakis; W B Guggino; G R Uhl Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1991-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: S N Piper; K D Röhm; M Papsdorf; W H Maleck; P Mattinger; J Boldt Journal: Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 0.698
Authors: Scott C Steffensen; Katie D Bradley; David M Hansen; Jeffrey D Wilcox; Rebecca S Wilcox; David W Allison; Collin B Merrill; Jeffrey G Edwards Journal: Synapse Date: 2010-12-28 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Mona Alqazzaz; Andrew J Thompson; Kerry L Price; Hans-Georg Breitinger; Sarah C R Lummis Journal: Biophys J Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Aaron Janowsky; Amy J Eshleman; Robert A Johnson; Katherine M Wolfrum; David J Hinrichs; Jongtae Yang; T Mark Zabriskie; Martin J Smilkstein; Michael K Riscoe Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-02-02 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: David W Allison; Rebecca S Wilcox; Kyle L Ellefsen; Caitlin E Askew; David M Hansen; Jeffrey D Wilcox; Stephanie S Sandoval; Dennis L Eggett; Yuchio Yanagawa; Scott C Steffensen Journal: Synapse Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Timothy J Schoenfeld; Alexander D Kloth; Brian Hsueh; Matthew B Runkle; Gary A Kane; Samuel S-H Wang; Elizabeth Gould Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Frederic Pouille; Thomas S McTavish; Lawrence E Hunter; Diego Restrepo; Nathan E Schoppa Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-07-23 Impact factor: 5.182