Literature DB >> 28640508

Intraglomerular gap junctions enhance interglomerular synchrony in a sparsely connected olfactory bulb network.

Frederic Pouille1, Thomas S McTavish2, Lawrence E Hunter2,3, Diego Restrepo4, Nathan E Schoppa1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Despite sparse connectivity, population-level interactions between mitral cells (MCs) and granule cells (GCs) can generate synchronized oscillations in the rodent olfactory bulb. Intraglomerular gap junctions between MCs at the same glomerulus can greatly enhance synchronized activity of MCs at different glomeruli. The facilitating effect of intraglomerular gap junctions on interglomerular synchrony is through triggering of mutually synchronizing interactions between MCs and GCs. Divergent connections between MCs and GCs make minimal direct contribution to synchronous activity. ABSTRACT: A dominant feature of the olfactory bulb response to odour is fast synchronized oscillations at beta (15-40 Hz) or gamma (40-90 Hz) frequencies, thought to be involved in integration of olfactory signals. Mechanistically, the bulb presents an interesting case study for understanding how beta/gamma oscillations arise. Fast oscillatory synchrony in the activity of output mitral cells (MCs) appears to result from interactions with GABAergic granule cells (GCs), yet the incidence of MC-GC connections is very low, around 4%. Here, we combined computational and experimental approaches to examine how oscillatory synchrony can nevertheless arise, focusing mainly on activity between 'non-sister' MCs affiliated with different glomeruli (interglomerular synchrony). In a sparsely connected model of MCs and GCs, we found first that interglomerular synchrony was generally quite low, but could be increased by a factor of 4 by physiological levels of gap junctional coupling between sister MCs at the same glomerulus. This effect was due to enhanced mutually synchronizing interactions between MC and GC populations. The potent role of gap junctions was confirmed in patch-clamp recordings in bulb slices from wild-type and connexin 36-knockout (KO) mice. KO reduced both beta and gamma local field potential oscillations as well as synchrony of inhibitory signals in pairs of non-sister MCs. These effects were independent of potential KO actions on network excitation. Divergent synaptic connections did not contribute directly to the vast majority of synchronized signals. Thus, in a sparsely connected network, gap junctions between a small subset of cells can, through population effects, greatly amplify oscillatory synchrony amongst unconnected cells.
© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2017 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gap junction; olfactory bulb; synchronization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640508      PMCID: PMC5577541          DOI: 10.1113/JP274408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  70 in total

1.  Regulation of synaptic timing in the olfactory bulb by an A-type potassium current.

Authors:  N E Schoppa; G L Westbrook
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Inhibition of backpropagating action potentials in mitral cell secondary dendrites.

Authors:  Graeme Lowe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex.

Authors:  Carl Holmgren; Tibor Harkany; Björn Svennenfors; Yuri Zilberter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Interplay between local GABAergic interneurons and relay neurons generates gamma oscillations in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Samuel Lagier; Alan Carleton; Pierre-Marie Lledo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  ModelDB: A Database to Support Computational Neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael L Hines; Thomas Morse; Michele Migliore; Nicholas T Carnevale; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Chemical factors determine olfactory system beta oscillations in waking rats.

Authors:  Catherine A Lowry; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Experience-dependent maturation of the glomerular microcircuit.

Authors:  Brady J Maher; Matthew J McGinley; Gary L Westbrook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Parallel processing of afferent olfactory sensory information.

Authors:  Christopher E Vaaga; Gary L Westbrook
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Direct actions of carbenoxolone on synaptic transmission and neuronal membrane properties.

Authors:  Kenneth R Tovar; Brady J Maher; Gary L Westbrook
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties.

Authors:  N Kopell; G B Ermentrout; M A Whittington; R D Traub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  The symphony of smell: a role for electrical synapses.

Authors:  Graeme Lowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Inhibitory circuits of the mammalian main olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cell and circuit origins of fast network oscillations in the mammalian main olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton; Nathaniel N Urban
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms That Differentiate Mitral Cells and Superficial Tufted Cells Into Parallel Output Channels in the Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Shelly Jones; Joel Zylberberg; Nathan Schoppa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Connectivity and dynamics in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  David E Chen Kersen; Gaia Tavoni; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Heterocellular Coupling Between Amacrine Cells and Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Crystal Lynn Sigulinsky; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Daniel Emrich; James Russell Anderson; Bryan William Jones
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.