Literature DB >> 18310377

Hospital, simulation center, and teamwork training for eclampsia management: a randomized controlled trial.

Denise Ellis1, Joanna F Crofts, Linda P Hunt, Mike Read, Robert Fox, Mark James.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of training for eclampsia in local hospitals and a regional simulation center, with and without teamwork theory.
METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial of training in local hospitals and in a simulation center in the United Kingdom. Midwives and obstetricians working at participating hospitals were randomly assigned to 24 teams. Teams were randomly allocated to training in local hospitals or at a simulation center, and to teamwork theory or not. Performance was evaluated before and after training with a standardized eclampsia scenario captured on video. Outcome measures were completion of tasks, time to completion of tasks, administration of magnesium sulfate, and quality of teamwork.
RESULTS: Training was associated with an increase in completion of basic tasks; 87% before training and 100% afterward. Basic tasks were completed more quickly; 55 seconds compared with 27 seconds, P=.012. The magnesium sulfate loading dose was administered by 61% of teams before training and by 92% afterward (P=.040). There was a shorter median time to administration (116 seconds less; P=.011). Training at the simulation center was not associated with additional improvement. Teamwork generally improved (median global score rose from 2.5 to 4.0; P<.001) but there was no additional benefit from teamwork training.
CONCLUSION: Training resulted in enhanced performance with higher rates of completion for basic tasks, shorter times to administration of magnesium sulfate, and improved teamwork. There was no additional benefit from training in a simulation center, and none from teamwork theory. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, http://isrctn.org, ISRCTN67906788, reference number 0270030.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310377     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181637a82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

1.  Multi-professional training for obstetric emergencies in a U.S. hospital over a 7-year interval: an observational study.

Authors:  C P Weiner; L Collins; S Bentley; Y Dong; C L Satterwhite
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Integrated Approach to Reduce Perinatal Adverse Events: Standardized Processes, Interdisciplinary Teamwork Training, and Performance Feedback.

Authors:  William Riley; James W Begun; Les Meredith; Kristi K Miller; Kathy Connolly; Rebecca Price; Janet H Muri; Mac McCullough; Stanley Davis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Assessment of long-term knowledge retention following single-day simulation training for uncommon but critical obstetrical events.

Authors:  Mary A Vadnais; Laura E Dodge; Christopher S Awtrey; Hope A Ricciotti; Toni H Golen; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-04-25

4.  Assessing the Effect of E-Learning on Perineal Repair Knowledge and Skill Acquisition.

Authors:  Kimberly Blom; Ana-Maria Iancu; Rachel Tyli; Tess Coppinger; Melissa Tai; Kit Shan Lee
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  The evolution of the midwife in the obstetric high dependency unit.

Authors:  Jennifer Kielty; Ross Bowe; Andrew O'Donoghue; Karen Sherlock; Ingrid Browne; Terry Tan; Siaghal MacColgain
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Multi-professional simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance.

Authors:  Annemarie F Fransen; Joost van de Ven; Franyke R Banga; Ben Willem J Mol; S Guid Oei
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Is high fidelity simulation the most effective method for the development of non-technical skills in nursing? A review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Robin Lewis; Alasdair Strachan; Michelle McKenzie Smith
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2012-07-27

8.  'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Cees Van der Vleuten; Jane Lindschou; Christian Gluud; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Marianne Johansen; Kim Ekelund; Charlotte Krebs Albrechtsen; Berit Woetman Pedersen; Hanne Kjærgaard; Pia Weikop; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Onsite training of doctors, midwives and nurses in obstetric emergencies, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Joanna F Crofts; Teclar Mukuli; Bobb T Murove; Solwayo Ngwenya; Sma Mhlanga; Meluleki Dube; Elton Sengurayi; Cathy Winter; Sharon Jordan; Sonia Barnfield; Heather Wilcox; Abi Merriel; Sabelo Ndlovu; Zedekiah Sibanda; Sikangezile Moyo; Wedu Ndebele; Tim J Draycott; Thabani Sibanda
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 10.  Effective in-service training design and delivery: evidence from an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Julia Bluestone; Peter Johnson; Judith Fullerton; Catherine Carr; Jessica Alderman; James BonTempo
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.