Literature DB >> 18308586

Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception.

Sean A Spence1, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes, Tom F D Farrow, Iain D Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Behavioural and functional anatomical responses exhibited by humans support the hypothesis that deception involves the prefrontal executive. Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (among other areas) is activated during lying, compared with telling the truth. However, despite some consistencies discernible across studies, problems remain concerning experimental validity, e.g., the expediencies of experimenter-sanctioned cued-deception (i.e., subjects being told when to lie); such 'lies' may not have comprised adequate proxies for 'real-life' deception. In this experiment, we attempted to address such confounding issues by designing an fMRI paradigm in which subjects chose when to lie (thereby minimising cue-dependency), using spoken words, concerning intimate material, which they regarded as 'embarrassing'; and where further control conditions required them to 'comply' with their examiners or to 'defy' them (by withholding pre-specified responses). The main effect of lying revealed significant activation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortices. These results replicate and extend our previous findings to those circumstances under which subjects are allowed to choose when to deceive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18308586     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of psychogenic movement disorders.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; David C Van Essen; Jason M Watson; Lindsay E Brubaker; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The role of anterior prefrontal cortex (area 10) in face-to-face deception measured with fNIRS.

Authors:  Paola Pinti; Andrea Devoto; Isobel Greenhalgh; Ilias Tachtsidis; Paul W Burgess; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Lying about the valence of affective pictures: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tatia M C Lee; Tiffany M Y Lee; Adrian Raine; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Steven J Laken; Kevin A Johnson; Bryant Boren; Kimberly S Mapes; Paul S Morgan; Mark S George
Journal:  Open Forensic Sci J       Date:  2009-01-01

6.  Modulation of financial deprivation on deception and its neural correlates.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Xiaoli Ling; Li Zheng; Jia Chen; Lin Li; Zhiyuan Liu; Xuemei Cheng; Xiuyan Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The neural correlates of identity faking and concealment: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Xiaoxia Du; Du Lei; Chao Super Hu; Genyue Fu; Guopeng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do parkinsonian patients have trouble telling lies? The neurobiological basis of deceptive behaviour.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe; Toshikatsu Fujii; Kazumi Hirayama; Atsushi Takeda; Yoshiyuki Hosokai; Toshiyuki Ishioka; Yoshiyuki Nishio; Kyoko Suzuki; Yasuto Itoyama; Shoki Takahashi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Bruno Verschuere; Teresa Schuhmann; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  When Pinocchio's nose does not grow: belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception.

Authors:  Kamila E Sip; David Carmel; Jennifer L Marchant; Jian Li; Predrag Petrovic; Andreas Roepstorff; William B McGregor; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.