Literature DB >> 18307773

Barking up the wrong tree: modern northern European dogs fail to explain their origin.

Helena Malmström1, Carles Vilà, M Thomas P Gilbert, Jan Storå, Eske Willerslev, Gunilla Holmlund, Anders Götherström.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Geographic distribution of the genetic diversity in domestic animals, particularly mitochondrial DNA, has often been used to infer centers of domestication. The underlying presumption is that phylogeographic patterns among domesticates were established during, or shortly after the domestication. Human activities are assumed not to have altered the haplogroup frequencies to any great extent. We studied this hypothesis by analyzing 24 mtDNA sequences in ancient Scandinavian dogs. Breeds originating in northern Europe are characterized by having a high frequency of mtDNA sequences belonging to a haplogroup rare in other populations (HgD). This has been suggested to indicate a possible origin of the haplogroup (perhaps even a separate domestication) in central or northern Europe.
RESULTS: The sequences observed in the ancient samples do not include the haplogroup indicative for northern European breeds (HgD). Instead, several of them correspond to haplogroups that are uncommon in the region today and that are supposed to have Asian origin.
CONCLUSION: We find no evidence for local domestication. We conclude that interpretation of the processes responsible for current domestic haplogroup frequencies should be carried out with caution if based only on contemporary data. They do not only tell their own story, but also that of humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18307773      PMCID: PMC2288593          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Evol Biol        ISSN: 1471-2148            Impact factor:   3.260


Background

Mitochondrial phylogeography is a useful tool for the study of wild populations [1]. But applying phylogeography to domestic species is more complicated. For example, the arrival of dogs into the New World was not a simple expansion of Asian dog populations, but a consequence of human migrations [2]. Humans have a history of population movements and social changes over the last ten thousand years [3-6], and this, together with the human-mediated breeding history has affected the genetic composition of livestock animals [7]. Therefore, human influence cannot be neglected when studying patterns of genetic diversity in domesticates. A classic example of the use of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity to infer the history of domestication refers to dogs (Canis familiaris). Four to six mitochondrial haplogroups (Hg) have been described in genetic studies of modern dogs [8], indicating recurrent domestication or backcrosses between domestic dogs and wild wolves (Canis lupus). Three of the major Hgs are distributed throughout the world, whereas one (D) is restricted to Europe, especially in breeds originating in Scandinavia [8-11]. Similar patterns of fragmented genetic diversity have been used to argue for local domestication in other species [12]. Such scenario could apply to dogs as they appear as early as 9000 years ago in Scandinavia [13,14], and as dogs and wolf remains have been found on the same sites [15,16]. We have genetically typed mtDNA from ancient Scandinavian dog remains to investigate whether the high frequency of a rare dog Hg in northern Europe is evidence of a local domestication event. We predict that an early domestication event in Scandinavia would be visible in a notable frequency of Hg D in ancient Scandinavian dog remains.

Results and Discussion

Reproducible sequence data for the full 219 bp sequence was recovered from 18 samples. The remaining six specimens only yielded reproducible sequence data for a shorter 107 bp product (DQ860843-3 DQ860864, AY673648–AY673672, Table 1). Phylogenetic reconstruction including the 18 prehistoric dogs that yielded complete sequences and 543 modern dog sequences [11] revealed that all prehistoric dogs grouped within modern Hgs (Figure 1). Seven of the 18 sequences belonged to Hg A, the group that encompasses more than 70% of all tested modern dogs around the world [11], while the remaining eleven belonged to the now rare Hg C. Previously published data on 273 Swedish dogs indicated frequencies of the four major Hgs: A 69.2%, B 18.3%, C 7.0%, and D 5.5% [9]. When only native Scandinavian breeds were considered (n = 54), the haplotype frequency for Hg D increased to 33.3% [9]. A comparison of the 219 bp sequences obtained from the ancient dog specimens (n = 18) and the contemporary native breeds indicates that the frequency of Hg D is significantly reduced in the ancient data set (0% in the ancient dataset, 33% in the modern dataset, p < 0.001). The remaining six ancient Scandinavian dogs that yielded only 107 bp of reproducible sequence data, also indicated an absence of Hg D (Table 2). In total, eleven sequences had substitution patterns indicative for Hg A, while the remaining 13 had a substitution indicative for Hg C (Table 1).
Table 1

Description of material and Hg belonging.

SampleLocalityElementAgeHaplogroup
21,2Korsnäs#BoneNeolithicC
31Korsnäs#BoneNeolithicA*
41,2Korsnäs#BoneNeolithicA
121,3BergsgravenBoneNeolithicC
131,2AjvideBoneNeolithicC
151,2Ajvide#BoneNeolithicC
161,2Ajvide#BoneNeolithicA
171,2AjvideBoneNeolithicC
181,2AjvideBoneNeolithicC
191,2Ajvide#BoneNeolithicC
211,2AjvideTeethNeolithicC
221,2Ajvide#TeethNeolithicC
231,2AjvideTeethNeolithicC
251,3AjvideToothNeolithicC
261,3Skara ABoneMedievalA*
271,2Skara BBoneMedievalA
281StockholmBoneMedievalC*
302,3VisbyTeethNeolithicA
323EketorpBoneMedievalC*
333EketorpBoneMedievalA*
343EketorpBoneMedievalA*
12433SunnerbyToothMedievalA
2293SunnerbyBoneMedievalA
2313SunnerbyBoneMedievalA

Scandinavian dog remains yielding DNA. Sample name, locality, element (tooth or bone), age, and haplogroup are specified. Those independently replicated are marked with #, those only yielding the 107 bp fragment are marked with * (otherwise, the total length of the studied sequence is 219 bp). Sequences are from Malmström et al 20051 (107 bp), Malmström et al 20072 (112 bp), and from this study3 (either or both fragments).

Figure 1

Reduced median network based on 561 sequences (216 bp in length) including 18 ancient sequences (full sequences, not only those in Table 2) produced in this study and a coyote ( After removing tri-status characters, 36 haplotypes remain; those in red contain at least one ancient Scandinavian individual. A NJ tree based on Kimura-2 and bootstrapped with 1000 pseudoreplicates yielded a similar topology where Hg A was not supported, Hg B received 81% support, Hg C 84%, and Hg D 65%. Four medieval and three Neolithic dogs are distributed among the Hg A sequences, and 11 Neolithic sequences are distributed within the C clade.

Table 2

Description of genetic data.

155951561115625156261563815639156501565215665Hg
RefCTTATTTGT-
2····G·C··C
3····A···CA
4···GA···CA
12····G·C··C
13·C··G·C··C
15·C··G·C··C
16····A···CA
17·C··G·C··C
18·C··G·C··C
19·C··G·C··C
21·C··G·C··C
22·C··G·C··C
23·C··G·C··C
25·C··G·C··C
26···GA····A
27···GA····A
28·C··G·C··C
30····A···CA
32·C··G·C··C
33···GA····A
34····A····A
1243·········A
229·········A
231·········A

Haplogroup-specific substitutions in a 107 bp fragment of the D-loop (15561–15668) and their occurrence in 24 ancient Scandinavian dogs. The reference sequence is from Kim et al. 1998.

Description of material and Hg belonging. Scandinavian dog remains yielding DNA. Sample name, locality, element (tooth or bone), age, and haplogroup are specified. Those independently replicated are marked with #, those only yielding the 107 bp fragment are marked with * (otherwise, the total length of the studied sequence is 219 bp). Sequences are from Malmström et al 20051 (107 bp), Malmström et al 20072 (112 bp), and from this study3 (either or both fragments). Description of genetic data. Haplogroup-specific substitutions in a 107 bp fragment of the D-loop (15561–15668) and their occurrence in 24 ancient Scandinavian dogs. The reference sequence is from Kim et al. 1998. Reduced median network based on 561 sequences (216 bp in length) including 18 ancient sequences (full sequences, not only those in Table 2) produced in this study and a coyote ( After removing tri-status characters, 36 haplotypes remain; those in red contain at least one ancient Scandinavian individual. A NJ tree based on Kimura-2 and bootstrapped with 1000 pseudoreplicates yielded a similar topology where Hg A was not supported, Hg B received 81% support, Hg C 84%, and Hg D 65%. Four medieval and three Neolithic dogs are distributed among the Hg A sequences, and 11 Neolithic sequences are distributed within the C clade. When the complete ancient dataset was compared to the contemporary dataset, it proved equally improbable (p < 0.001) that Hg D was present in the oldest specimens in a frequency similar to that observed in modern dogs. Using a binomial distribution, we estimate that the frequency of Hg D must have been lower than 0.118 in the original population for us not to have noticed it in 24 samples (p < 0.05), and lower than 0. 182 during the Neolithic for us not to have noticed it in 15 samples (p < 0.05). Lastly, the χ2 test between the Hg frequencies of the complete ancient dataset with that of the complete Scandinavian (not only considering native breeds) demonstrated a significant deviation between the modern and ancient frequencies (p < 0.0388, χ2 = 4.27, df = 1). Our results indicate that Hg frequencies have been altered in Scandinavian dogs since their first arrival. Interestingly, while Hg C is overrepresented in our ancient material, there is a complete lack of the Scandinavian group D in our ancient dataset. Hg D is the one that could support a Scandinavian origin whereas Hg C is suggested to be of Asian origin [11]. Thus, we find no obvious evidence for prehistoric canid domestication in Scandinavia. An external origin of Scandinavian dogs is supported by morphologic data, as even the oldest remains of dogs in Scandinavia were of smaller size than those of prehistoric and extant wolves [15,17]. While canid domestication may have occurred in other parts of Europe [18], Scandinavian dogs were likely imported and had experienced a long period of morphological change under human control before they reached the Scandinavian peninsula.

Conclusion

In a wider context, our data calls for caution when using modern sequences of domestic animals to interpret the history of domestication. There is a profound difference on selective forces on wild and domestic animals. Domesticates are subject to constant manipulation and follow the same historic vicissitudes as the associated human population. For example, genetic diversity may change rapidly due to intense selective breeding, backcrossing with the wild ancestor [19-22], migration of human groups with genetically different domesticates [2], and decimation of local populations by invaders [23]. Hg frequency could change over a short period of few generations. While diversity and branching pattern of mitochondrial DNA may be used to study the number and possible antiquity of domestication events, phylogeographical patterns in domestic species may indeed not be suitable to base discussion on their geographical origin. Close collaboration between zooarchaeologists and molecular biologists, involving the study of ancient specimens, may be the only way to verify the continuity through time of the species that have set the basis of our culture.

Methods

We analysed sequences from 24 archaeological domestic dogs. The skeletal material represents eight Scandinavian sites: four Neolithic (≈5300–4500 BP) and four Medieval (≈1000–500 BP) (Table 1, Figure 2). DNA was extracted, PCR-amplified and sequenced according to previously published protocols [24,25] (Table 1). A subset of the sample sequences (n = 7) was replicated in an independent laboratory (Center for Ancient Genetics, University of Copenhagen) confirming the original results in all cases. The new data was combined with previously published data [24,25] for analysis (see Table 1). Most of the Neolithic samples, those from Ajvide, Visby, and Korsnäs (Figure 2), were recovered as isolated findings in cultural layers. One sample was from a complete skeleton found in a burial in Central Sweden (Bergsgraven in Linköping). The Medieval samples originated from isolated skeletal remains recovered in urban (Skara and Stockholm) or rural contexts (Eketorp, Sunnerby).
Figure 2

Samples were collected from eight different archaeological localities in southern Scandinavia, four Neolithic (empty circles) and four medieval (black dots).

Samples were collected from eight different archaeological localities in southern Scandinavia, four Neolithic (empty circles) and four medieval (black dots). We used polymorphisms found within a 219 bp fragment of the dog D-loop region and comparison with previously published sequences to determine Hgs. To portray the relationship between sequences we constructed a reduced median network, including all 219 bp, using Network 4.1 [26]; threshold was set to 1. The default parameters for reduction were used, where parallel mutations are assumed to be more frequent between existing sequences, than between an existing sequence and a median vector. As the reduction was intense, a NJ tree was constructed to support the network using the Kimura 2-parameter model of sequence evolution. Support for the nodes was assessed with 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates. The Hg frequencies within the ancient datasets were compared to those in modern Scandinavian dogs [9] using χ2 tests. To ensure a minimum sample of 5 for all cells in χ2 tests, we pooled Hgs A and D, and C and B (following the best natural grouping according to the network, Figure 1). Finally, we used the binomial distribution to estimate the probability of observing as many sequences from Hg D as found in the ancient samples assuming that the relative frequency was the same as in modern native Scandinavian dogs.

Authors' contributions

HM did all experimental work apart from the independent replications, and helped analyse the data and write the paper. CV did part of the analytical work, and helped write the paper. TG and EW did the independent replication. TG revised the language. JS did the morphological selection, and described the archaeology. GH supervised the experimental work. AG did the analytical work together with HM and CV, and wrote the paper together with HM and CV. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary.

Authors:  G M Hewitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution.

Authors:  Brigitte Pakendorf; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Genes of domestic mammals augmented by backcrossing with wild ancestors.

Authors:  Carles Vilà; Jennifer Seddon; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Y-chromosome diversity in Sweden - a long-time perspective.

Authors:  Andreas O Karlsson; Thomas Wallerström; Anders Götherström; Gunilla Holmlund
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog.

Authors:  C Vilà; P Savolainen; J E Maldonado; I R Amorim; J E Rice; R L Honeycutt; K A Crandall; J Lundeberg; R K Wayne
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Forensic informativity of domestic dog mtDNA control region sequences.

Authors:  Helen Angleby; Peter Savolainen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Extensive human DNA contamination in extracts from ancient dog bones and teeth.

Authors:  Helena Malmström; Jan Storå; Love Dalén; Gunilla Holmlund; Anders Götherström
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication.

Authors:  Greger Larson; Keith Dobney; Umberto Albarella; Meiying Fang; Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith; Judith Robins; Stewart Lowden; Heather Finlayson; Tina Brand; Eske Willerslev; Peter Rowley-Conwy; Leif Andersson; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cattle domestication in the Near East was followed by hybridization with aurochs bulls in Europe.

Authors:  Anders Götherström; Cecilia Anderung; Linda Hellborg; Rengert Elburg; Colin Smith; Dan G Bradley; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Mitochondrial DNA from prehistoric canids highlights relationships between dogs and South-East European wolves.

Authors:  Fabio Verginelli; Cristian Capelli; Valentina Coia; Marco Musiani; Mario Falchetti; Laura Ottini; Raffaele Palmirotta; Antonio Tagliacozzo; Iacopo De Grossi Mazzorin; Renato Mariani-Costantini
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Man's best friend becomes biology's best in show: genome analyses in the domestic dog.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Abigail L Shearin; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Establishing the validity of domestication genes using DNA from ancient chickens.

Authors:  Linus Girdland Flink; Richard Allen; Ross Barnett; Helena Malmström; Joris Peters; Jonas Eriksson; Leif Andersson; Keith Dobney; Greger Larson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic structure in village dogs reveals a Central Asian domestication origin.

Authors:  Laura M Shannon; Ryan H Boyko; Marta Castelhano; Elizabeth Corey; Jessica J Hayward; Corin McLean; Michelle E White; Mounir Abi Said; Baddley A Anita; Nono Ikombe Bondjengo; Jorge Calero; Ana Galov; Marius Hedimbi; Bulu Imam; Rajashree Khalap; Douglas Lally; Andrew Masta; Kyle C Oliveira; Lucía Pérez; Julia Randall; Nguyen Minh Tam; Francisco J Trujillo-Cornejo; Carlos Valeriano; Nathan B Sutter; Rory J Todhunter; Carlos D Bustamante; Adam R Boyko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Adaptation and niche construction in human prehistory: a case study from the southern Scandinavian Late Glacial.

Authors:  Felix Riede
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Regional occurrence, high frequency but low diversity of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup d1 suggests a recent dog-wolf hybridization in Scandinavia.

Authors:  C F C Klütsch; E H Seppälä; T Fall; M Uhlén; A Hedhammar; H Lohi; P Savolainen
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Mitochondrial sequence variation in ancient horses from the Carpathian Basin and possible modern relatives.

Authors:  K Priskin; K Szabó; G Tömöry; E Bogácsi-Szabó; B Csányi; R Eördögh; C S Downes; I Raskó
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Phylogenetic distinctiveness of Middle Eastern and Southeast Asian village dog Y chromosomes illuminates dog origins.

Authors:  Sarah K Brown; Niels C Pedersen; Sardar Jafarishorijeh; Danika L Bannasch; Kristen D Ahrens; Jui-Te Wu; Michaella Okon; Benjamin N Sacks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using classical population genetics tools with heterochroneous data: time matters!

Authors:  Frantz Depaulis; Ludovic Orlando; Catherine Hänni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs.

Authors:  Anders Bergström; Laurent Frantz; Ryan Schmidt; Erik Ersmark; Ophelie Lebrasseur; Linus Girdland-Flink; Audrey T Lin; Jan Storå; Karl-Göran Sjögren; David Anthony; Ekaterina Antipina; Sarieh Amiri; Guy Bar-Oz; Vladimir I Bazaliiskii; Jelena Bulatović; Dorcas Brown; Alberto Carmagnini; Tom Davy; Sergey Fedorov; Ivana Fiore; Deirdre Fulton; Mietje Germonpré; James Haile; Evan K Irving-Pease; Alexandra Jamieson; Luc Janssens; Irina Kirillova; Liora Kolska Horwitz; Julka Kuzmanovic-Cvetković; Yaroslav Kuzmin; Robert J Losey; Daria Ložnjak Dizdar; Marjan Mashkour; Mario Novak; Vedat Onar; David Orton; Maja Pasarić; Miljana Radivojević; Dragana Rajković; Benjamin Roberts; Hannah Ryan; Mikhail Sablin; Fedor Shidlovskiy; Ivana Stojanović; Antonio Tagliacozzo; Katerina Trantalidou; Inga Ullén; Aritza Villaluenga; Paula Wapnish; Keith Dobney; Anders Götherström; Anna Linderholm; Love Dalén; Ron Pinhasi; Greger Larson; Pontus Skoglund
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  mtDNA data indicate a single origin for dogs south of Yangtze River, less than 16,300 years ago, from numerous wolves.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Pang; Cornelya Kluetsch; Xiao-Ju Zou; Ai-bing Zhang; Li-Yang Luo; Helen Angleby; Arman Ardalan; Camilla Ekström; Anna Sköllermo; Joakim Lundeberg; Shuichi Matsumura; Thomas Leitner; Ya-Ping Zhang; Peter Savolainen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.