| Literature DB >> 26483491 |
Laura M Shannon1, Ryan H Boyko2, Marta Castelhano3, Elizabeth Corey3, Jessica J Hayward1, Corin McLean4, Michelle E White1, Mounir Abi Said5, Baddley A Anita6, Nono Ikombe Bondjengo7, Jorge Calero8, Ana Galov9, Marius Hedimbi10, Bulu Imam11, Rajashree Khalap12, Douglas Lally13, Andrew Masta14, Kyle C Oliveira1, Lucía Pérez15, Julia Randall16, Nguyen Minh Tam17, Francisco J Trujillo-Cornejo15, Carlos Valeriano8, Nathan B Sutter18, Rory J Todhunter3, Carlos D Bustamante19, Adam R Boyko20.
Abstract
Dogs were the first domesticated species, originating at least 15,000 y ago from Eurasian gray wolves. Dogs today consist primarily of two specialized groups--a diverse set of nearly 400 pure breeds and a far more populous group of free-ranging animals adapted to a human commensal lifestyle (village dogs). Village dogs are more genetically diverse and geographically widespread than purebred dogs making them vital for unraveling dog population history. Using a semicustom 185,805-marker genotyping array, we conducted a large-scale survey of autosomal, mitochondrial, and Y chromosome diversity in 4,676 purebred dogs from 161 breeds and 549 village dogs from 38 countries. Geographic structure shows both isolation and gene flow have shaped genetic diversity in village dog populations. Some populations (notably those in the Neotropics and the South Pacific) are almost completely derived from European stock, whereas others are clearly admixed between indigenous and European dogs. Importantly, many populations--including those of Vietnam, India, and Egypt-show minimal evidence of European admixture. These populations exhibit a clear gradient of short--range linkage disequilibrium consistent with a Central Asian domestication origin.Entities:
Keywords: admixture; domestication; haplotype diversity; introgression; linkage disequilibrium
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26483491 PMCID: PMC4640804 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516215112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205