OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and outcomes of individuals with psychosocial impairment not meeting DSM-III-R criteria for any of 29 well-defined disorders and to suggest operational definitions for not otherwise specified (NOS) diagnoses and V codes. METHODS: Two-stage general population sampling resulted in 1,015 youths aged 9, 11, and 13 years being interviewed in the first wave of the Great Smoky Mountains Study. They were reinterviewed 1 year later using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of sibling relational problems was found to be 1.4%. That of parent-child relational problems was 3.6% and that of relational problems NOS was 0.6%. The overall rate of symptomatic impairment was 9.4%. Across a variety of "caseness measures," those with symptomatic impairment proved to be more disturbed than those without either a diagnosis or impairment, and as disturbed as those with a diagnosis but without impairment. CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents who do not meet DSM-III-R criteria for any well-defined disorder but who have symptoms associated with psychosocial impairment should be regarded as suffering from a psychiatric disorder. It is suggested that researchers adopt this definition for the many NOS diagnoses included in the DSM nosology and implement it in their research diagnostic algorithms.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and outcomes of individuals with psychosocial impairment not meeting DSM-III-R criteria for any of 29 well-defined disorders and to suggest operational definitions for not otherwise specified (NOS) diagnoses and V codes. METHODS: Two-stage general population sampling resulted in 1,015 youths aged 9, 11, and 13 years being interviewed in the first wave of the Great Smoky Mountains Study. They were reinterviewed 1 year later using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of sibling relational problems was found to be 1.4%. That of parent-child relational problems was 3.6% and that of relational problems NOS was 0.6%. The overall rate of symptomatic impairment was 9.4%. Across a variety of "caseness measures," those with symptomatic impairment proved to be more disturbed than those without either a diagnosis or impairment, and as disturbed as those with a diagnosis but without impairment. CONCLUSION:Children and adolescents who do not meet DSM-III-R criteria for any well-defined disorder but who have symptoms associated with psychosocial impairment should be regarded as suffering from a psychiatric disorder. It is suggested that researchers adopt this definition for the many NOS diagnoses included in the DSM nosology and implement it in their research diagnostic algorithms.
Authors: Ronny Bruffaerts; Jose Posada-Villa; Ali Obaid Al-Hamzawi; Oye Gureje; Yueqin Huang; Chiyi Hu; Evelyn J Bromet; Maria Carmen Viana; Hristo Ruskov Hinkov; Elie G Karam; Guilherme Borges; Silvia E Florescu; David R Williams; Koen Demyttenaere; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Herbert Matschinger; Daphna Levinson; Giovanni de Girolamo; Yutaka Ono; Ron de Graaf; Mark Oakley Browne; Brendan Bunting; Miguel Xavier; Josep Maria Haro; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Jamie Abelson; Olga Demler; Javier I Escobar; Miriam Gibbon; Margaret E Guyer; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; William A Vega; Ellen E Walters; Philip Wang; Alan Zaslavsky; Hui Zheng Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Laura J Dietz; Rebecca J Weinberg; David A Brent; Laura Mufson Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold; David B Goldston; Adam K Walsh; Beth A Reboussin; Stephanie Sergent Daniel; Enith Hickman; Frank B Wood Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2005-04
Authors: Annie A Garner; Briannon C Oʼconnor; Megan E Narad; Leanne Tamm; John Simon; Jeffery N Epstein Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.225