Literature DB >> 1830737

The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J M Sackier1, G Berci, E Phillips, B Carroll, S Shapiro, M Paz-Partlow.   

Abstract

Cholangiography is not routinely performed in open surgery, but there are reasons why it should be in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These include finding common duct stones, identifying the cystic-common duct junction, and noting an inadvertent injury. Thirty-six (7.0%) of 516 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were converted to open surgery; 24 before attempting cholangiography and 12 based on roentgenographic findings. In 73 patients (14.1%), cholangiography showed abnormal findings. Common duct injury was identified in one patient and common duct stones were found in 35. Twenty-one patients were treated laparoscopically and eight underwent open choledocholithotomy. In 22 patients, a short cystic duct was seen that might otherwise have been overlooked, and possible injury was avoided. Cholangiography should be attempted routinely, so that in cases with abnormal findings, open cholecystectomy may be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1830737     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410320111016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  38 in total

1.  Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Selective cholangiography. Current role in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; B H Wang; H A Pitt; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Intraoperative cholangiography time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing the radiographer.

Authors:  G El Shallaly; C Seow; C Sharp; A Mughrabi; A H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute.

Authors:  Theodoros Diamantis; Christos Tsigris; Andreas Kiriakopoulos; Efstathios Papalambros; John Bramis; Panagiotis Michail; Evangelos Felekouras; John Griniatsos; Theofilos Rosenberg; Nikolaos Kalahanis; Athanassios Giannopoulos; Christos Bakoyiannis; Elias Bastounis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sanket Srinivasa; Tarik Sammour; Bernard McEntee; Nicola Davis; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  Nigel T Barwood; Liora J Valinsky; Michael S T Hobbs; David R Fletcher; Matthew W Knuiman; Steve C Ridout
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  A comparison of intraoperative ultrasound versus cholangiography in the evaluation of the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Barteau; D Castro; M E Arregui; C Tetik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy with a small-caliber endoscope. A safe and effective technique for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  W E Kelley; V C Sheridan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cholecystocholangiography vs cystic duct cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  A Glättli; A Metzger; C Klaiber; C Seiler; G J Maddern; H U Baer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.