Literature DB >> 18306476

Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings.

Kyu Ran Cho1, Bo Kyoung Seo, Chul Hwan Kim, Kyu Won Whang, Yun Hwan Kim, Baek Hyun Kim, Ok Hee Woo, Young Hen Lee, Kyoo Byung Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiological findings of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to correlate those with histological features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2002 to March 2006, 22 patients with histologically-proven non-calcified DCIS were included. Mammography was obtained in 19 patients, ultrasound in 18 patients, and both examinations in 15 patients. Radiological findings were evaluated according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System by American College of Radiology. Histological tumor subtype and Van Nuys classification of DCIS were assessed.
RESULTS: Histological subtypes consisted of mixed type in 11 patients (50%), comedo in 4 (18%), cribriform in 4 (18%), papillary type in 2 (9%), and solid in one (5%). According to Van Nuys classification, group 3 DCIS was observed in 13 (59%) patients. In the 19 patients who underwent mammography, 13 patients presented with abnormal findings: focal asymmetry in 7 patients (37%), masses in 4 (21%), skin thickening in one (5%), and architectural distortion in one (5%). In the 18 patients who had received breast ultrasound, a mass was present in 15 (83%) patients and ductal changes in 3 patients (17%). Sixty percent of patients with masses on ultrasound had group 3 DCIS and 100% of patients with ductal change had group 1 DCIS (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of non-calcified DCIS by mammography is not an easy task due to the lack of typical malignant calcifications or masses. High resolution ultrasound can be useful for detecting non-calcified DCIS, and ultrasound findings are correlated with histological features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18306476      PMCID: PMC2615255          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.1.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  20 in total

1.  Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality.

Authors:  P J DiPiro; J E Meyer; C M Denison; T H Frenna; S C Harvey; D N Smith
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.

Authors:  S S Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast.

Authors:  S J Schnitt; W Silen; N L Sadowsky; J L Connolly; J R Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications.

Authors:  D D Dershaw; A Abramson; D W Kinne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  P C Stomper; J L Connolly; J E Meyer; J R Harris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; H Wilkie; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-10

7.  US of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Jae Sung Myung; Yu Jin Lee; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Jung-Gi Im
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Wei Tse Yang; Gary M K Tse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density.

Authors:  Isabelle Leconte; Chantal Feger; Christine Galant; Martine Berlière; Bruno Vande Berg; William D'Hoore; Baudouin Maldague
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Pavel Crystal; Selwyn D Strano; Semyon Shcharynski; Michael J Koretz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  9 in total

1.  Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Ultrasound evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Marco Moschetta; Angela Sardaro; Adriana Nitti; Michele Telegrafo; Nicola Maggialetti; Arnaldo Scardapane; Maria Chiara Brunese; Valentina Lavelli; Cristina Ferrari
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-06

3.  Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?

Authors:  Rohini Komarla; Lawrence Gilliland; Maria Piraner; Rebecca Seidel; Kelly Clifford; Jean Kunjummen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Oncoplastic surgical techniques for personalized breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patient with small to moderate sized breast.

Authors:  Jung Dug Yang; Jeong Woo Lee; Wan Wook Kim; Jin Hyang Jung; Ho Yong Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ found on stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications without mass: radiological-histological correlation.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz; Piotr Kasprzak; Przemyslaw Biecek; Agnieszka Halon; Rafal Matkowski
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions.

Authors:  Rick G Pleijhuis; Maurits Graafland; Jakob de Vries; Joost Bart; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Imaging of Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Ashley Bragg; Rosalind Candelaria; Beatriz Adrada; Monica Huang; Gaiane Rauch; Lumarie Santiago; Marion Scoggins; Gary Whitman
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2021-06-16

8.  Ultrasonographic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlations with pathologic features and biological markers.

Authors:  Hwajin Cha; Yun-Woo Chang; Eun Ji Lee; Ji Young Hwang; Hyun Joo Kim; Eun Hye Lee; Jung Kyu Ryu
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-10-13

9.  Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Jin Hyang Jung; Wan Wook Kim; Chan Sub Park; Ryu Kyung Lee; Hye Jung Kim; Won Hwa Kim; Ho Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.