Literature DB >> 21645098

The search for the neural mechanisms of the set size effect.

Trenton A Jerde1, Akiko Ikkai, Clayton E Curtis.   

Abstract

The set size effect in visual search refers to the linear increase in response time (RT) or decrease in accuracy as the number of distractors increases. Previous human and monkey studies have reported a correlation between set size and neural activity in the frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS). In a recent functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we did not observe a set size effect in the superior precentral sulcus (sPCS, thought to be the human homolog of the FEF) and IPS in an oculomotor visual search task (Ikkai et al., 2011). Our task used placeholders in the search array, along with the target and distractors, in order to equate the amount of retinal stimulation for each set size. We here attempted to reconcile these differences with the results from a follow-up experiment in which the same oculomotor visual search task was used, but without placeholders. A strong behavioral set size effect was observed in both studies, with very similar saccadic RTs and slopes between RT and set size. However, a set size effect was now observed in the sPCS and IPS. We comment on this finding and discuss the role of these neural areas in visual search.
© 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21645098      PMCID: PMC3111140          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07717.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  46 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  A Polonsky; R Blake; J Braun; D J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; E K Miller; J Duncan; R Desimone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return.

Authors:  Narcisse P Bichot; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The functional neuroanatomy of visual conjunction search: a parametric fMRI study.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Tobias H Donner; Oliver A Bartelt; Stephan A Brandt; Arno Villringer; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Effects of search efficiency on surround suppression during visual selection in frontal eye field.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Takashi R Sato; Kirk G Thompson; Amanda A Vaughn; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Comment on Cohen et al: Neural Basis of the Set-Size Effect in Frontal Eye Field: Timing of Attention During Visual Search.

Authors:  Puiu Balan; Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Attention mechanisms in visual search -- an fMRI study.

Authors:  U Leonards; S Sunaert; P Van Hecke; G A Orban
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; P De Weerd; M A Pinsk; M I Elizondo; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Allocation of attention during pursuit of large objects is no different than during fixation.

Authors:  Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Reconsidering Visual Search.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-11-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.