CONTEXT: Genetically determined heightened androgen sensitivity may influence the phenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). To date, studies of the androgen receptor exon 1 polymorphic CAG repeat have produced conflicting results in PCOS. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that a lower number of CAG repeats is associated with increased odds of PCOS. We also compared X-chromosome inactivation between cases and controls. DESIGN: Women with and without PCOS were genotyped for the CAG repeat and assessed for X-chromosome methylation. Association analyses were performed. SETTING: Subjects were recruited from the reproductive endocrinology clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham; controls were recruited from the surrounding community. Genotyping took place at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 330 women with PCOS and 289 controls (77% white, 23% black). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Androgen receptor genotype, X-chromosome methylation, and phenotyping for PCOS were measured. RESULTS: A smaller biallelic mean of CAG repeats was associated with increased odds of PCOS. X-chromosome inactivation was not different comparing cases with controls; however, in the subset with nonrandom inactivation, the chromosome bearing the shorter CAG allele was preferentially active in PCOS women. CONCLUSIONS: Association of shorter CAG repeats with PCOS is consistent with in vitro functional studies demonstrating higher activity of androgen receptors expressed from alleles with fewer CAG repeats, suggesting inherited alteration in androgen sensitivity may contribute to PCOS. In some women, such heightened sensitivity may also result from preferential expression of androgen receptors with shorter alleles. Thus, genetic and epigenetic changes may be involved in the pathogenesis of PCOS.
CONTEXT: Genetically determined heightened androgen sensitivity may influence the phenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). To date, studies of the androgen receptor exon 1 polymorphic CAG repeat have produced conflicting results in PCOS. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that a lower number of CAG repeats is associated with increased odds of PCOS. We also compared X-chromosome inactivation between cases and controls. DESIGN:Women with and without PCOS were genotyped for the CAG repeat and assessed for X-chromosome methylation. Association analyses were performed. SETTING: Subjects were recruited from the reproductive endocrinology clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham; controls were recruited from the surrounding community. Genotyping took place at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 330 women with PCOS and 289 controls (77% white, 23% black). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Androgen receptor genotype, X-chromosome methylation, and phenotyping for PCOS were measured. RESULTS: A smaller biallelic mean of CAG repeats was associated with increased odds of PCOS. X-chromosome inactivation was not different comparing cases with controls; however, in the subset with nonrandom inactivation, the chromosome bearing the shorter CAG allele was preferentially active in PCOSwomen. CONCLUSIONS: Association of shorter CAG repeats with PCOS is consistent with in vitro functional studies demonstrating higher activity of androgen receptors expressed from alleles with fewer CAG repeats, suggesting inherited alteration in androgen sensitivity may contribute to PCOS. In some women, such heightened sensitivity may also result from preferential expression of androgen receptors with shorter alleles. Thus, genetic and epigenetic changes may be involved in the pathogenesis of PCOS.
Authors: Matthias Möhlig; Annette Jürgens; Joachim Spranger; Kurt Hoffmann; Martin O Weickert; Hans W Schlösser; Thilo Schill; Georg Brabant; Andreas Schüring; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Jörg Gromoll; Christof Schöfl Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Ilma Simoni Brum; Poli Mara Spritzer; Françoise Paris; Maria Augusta Maturana; Françoise Audran; Charles Sultan Journal: J Soc Gynecol Investig Date: 2005-02
Authors: Sean Walsh; Joseph M Zmuda; Jane A Cauley; Patrick R Shea; E Jeffrey Metter; Ben F Hurley; Robert E Ferrell; Stephen M Roth Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2004-09-17
Authors: Jin Ju Kim; Seon Ha Choung; Young Min Choi; Sang Ho Yoon; Seok Hyun Kim; Shin Yong Moon Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Carol A Davis-Dao; Ellenie D Tuazon; Rebecca Z Sokol; Victoria K Cortessis Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-08-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Cui Ying Peng; Hui Jun Xie; Zi Fen Guo; Yu Lin Nie; Jun Chen; Jun Mei Zhou; Jie Yin Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Aline Ketefian; Michelle R Jones; Ronald M Krauss; Yii-Der I Chen; Richard S Legro; Ricardo Azziz; Mark O Goodarzi Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Shilpi Dasgupta; Pisapati V S Sirisha; Kudugunti Neelaveni; Kathragadda Anuradha; Alla G Reddy; Kumarasamy Thangaraj; B Mohan Reddy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 3.240