| Literature DB >> 18302749 |
Annelise Tran1, Nicolas Ponçon, Céline Toty, Catherine Linard, Hélène Guis, Jean-Baptiste Ferré, Danny Lo Seen, François Roger, Stéphane de la Rocque, Didier Fontenille, Thierry Baldet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although malaria disappeared from southern France more than 60 years ago, suspicions of recent autochthonous transmission in the French Mediterranean coast support the idea that the area could still be subject to malaria transmission. The main potential vector of malaria in the Camargue area, the largest river delta in southern France, is the mosquito Anopheles hyrcanus (Diptera: Culicidae). In the context of recent climatic and landscape changes, the evaluation of the risk of emergence or re-emergence of such a major disease is of great importance in Europe. When assessing the risk of emergence of vector-borne diseases, it is crucial to be able to characterize the arthropod vector's spatial distribution. Given that remote sensing techniques can describe some of the environmental parameters which drive this distribution, satellite imagery or aerial photographs could be used for vector mapping.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18302749 PMCID: PMC2291038 DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Health Geogr ISSN: 1476-072X Impact factor: 3.918
Figure 1Study area and location of the field study sites for entomological sampling. Background: Landsat ETM+ image, 25 October 2001, Eurimage©.
Figure 2Land cover map of the study sites (Carbonnière and Marais du Vigueirat, Camargue, France) and results of Anopheles hyrcanus larvae collection, April – October 2006.
Figure 3Results of . The circles show the maximum number of Anopheles hyrcanus adult mosquitoes trapped between March and October. The colour of the background indicates the distance to the nearest rice field (points near to rice fields are red-coloured while distant points are blue-coloured).
Accuracy assessment of three logistic-regression models for the presence of Anopheles hyrcanus larvae, Camargue area, France
| Model | % correct | Sensitivity (IC95%) | Specificity (IC95%) |
| Biotope | 77 % (58–89) | 0.68 (0.33–1) | |
| Distance | 69 % (53–.89) | 0.74 (0.38–1) | 0.71 (0.44–0.92) |
| Biotope + distance | 0.78 (0.61–0.93) |
Distance: Distance to the nearest rice field
Regression coefficients of the best model for presence of Anopheles hyrcanus larvae, Camargue area, France
| Model | Regression coefficient | [95% CI] | p |
| Intercept | -17.15 | [-18.94;-14.86] | - |
| Distance | -3.21 | [-6.17;-1.74] | 0.021 |
| Biotope | |||
| Clear water | 0 | - | - |
| Rush wetland | 0.92 | [-0.64;3.03] | 0.25 |
| Rice field | 17.67 | [15.38;19.45] | 0.005 |
| Reeds | 14.48 | [-0.12;16.59] | 0.084 |
| Marshes with | 17.50 | [14.99;19.24] | 0.009 |
CI: confidence interval
Distance: Distance to the nearest rice field
Figure 4Anopheles hyrcanus larval index map derived from satellite imagery, Camargue area, France.
Influence of buffer size in the calculation of the Anopheles hyrcanus adult index to the correlation coefficient between adult index and real mosquito abundance
| 100 | 0.63 | 9.4 10-3 |
| 200 | 0.94 | 6.11 10-8 |
| 400 | 0.83 | 6.71 10-5 |
| 500 | 0.71 | 2.10 10-3 |
| 600 | 0.64 | 8.15 10-3 |
| 700 | 0.59 | 1.53 10-2 |
| 800 | 0.56 | 2.30 10-2 |
| 900 | 0.59 | 1.71 10-2 |
| 1000 | 0.57 | 2.03 10-2 |
Figure 5Bidimensional representation of the real abundanceof . The circles show the real abundance of Anopheles hyrcanus mosquitoes (maximum number of adults trapped in CDC-light traps from March to October) and the solid line is the regression line.
Figure 6Anopheles hyrcanus density map derived from satellite imagery, Camargue area, France.