Literature DB >> 18301897

Performance of simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation in a sample of women with suspected osteoporosis in the Turkish population.

M Karkucak1, E Capkin, S Kerimoglu, M Serdaroglu, M Topbas, H Yildiz, M Guler.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in a random sample of postmenopausal women. We collected data on 177 consecutive patients aged over 45 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were taken at the hip and lumbar spine. The test performance cut-off value was evaluated according to scores of 5, 6, 7, 8 and age distribution. When all groups were evaluated, SCORE 6 sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 86.7, 59.1, 63, 82.5%, respectively. In the age ranged 45-49, we determined SCORE 6 results of Sn 85, Sp 100%. The test was able to identify women not requiring detailed densitometric investigation in this age group to a high level of accuracy. At SCORE 6 receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.6. We determined that the SCORE questionnaire performance in estimating those women with low BMD in the Turkish population was limited. However, since it is a simple, economical and practical pre-test, a SCORE 6 cut-off value can be used together with the physician's clinical analysis in sending patients with suspected low BMD for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18301897     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-008-0546-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in older Caucasian women: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  D Von Mühlen; A Visby Lunde; E Barrett-Connor; R Bettencourt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in a sample of white women from Belgium.

Authors:  W Ben Sedrine; J P Devogelaer; J M Kaufman; S Goemaere; G Depresseux; B Zegels; R Deroisy; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Profile of menopausal women in west Anatolian rural region sample.

Authors:  Guzel Discigil; Ayfer Gemalmaz; Nil Tekin; Okay Basak
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Performance of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in postmenopausal women aged 45-64 years.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; William C Miller; Florent Richy; Joanne M Garrett; Laura C Hanson; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  A risk-benefit assessment of alendronate in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  J P Devogelaer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Ferdinando Silveri; Andrea Stancati; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  The Canadian SCORE questionnaire: optimizing the use of technology for low bone density assessment. Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimate.

Authors:  W J Ungar; R Josse; S Lee; N Ryan; R Adachi; D Hanley; J Brown; M C Breton
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density.

Authors:  S Nayak; D L Edwards; A A Saleh; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.