Literature DB >> 15549501

Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.

Fausto Salaffi1, Ferdinando Silveri, Andrea Stancati, Walter Grassi.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis and its consequent increase in fracture risk is a major health concern for postmenopausal women and older men and has the potential to reach epidemic proportions. The "gold standard" for osteoporosis diagnosis is bone densitometry. However, economic issues or availability of the technology may prevent the possibility of mass screening. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a clinical scoring index designed as a prescreening tool to help clinicians identify which women are at increased risk of osteoporosis [bone mineral density (BMD) T-score -2.5 or less] and should therefore undergo further testing with bone densitometry. Records were analyzed for 1522 postmenopausal females over 50 years of age who had undergone testing with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis risk index scores were compared to bone density T-scores. Hologic QDR 4500 technology was used to measure BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4). Participants who had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis or were taking bone-active medication were excluded. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify the specific cutpoint value that would identify women at increased risk of low BMD. A simple algorithm based on age, weight, history of previous low impact fracture, early menopause, and corticosteroid therapy was developed. Validation of this five-item osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) index showed that the tool, at the recommended threshold (or cutoff value) of two, had a sensitivity that ranged from 88.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean: 86.2-91.9%] at the femoral neck to 90% (95% CI for the mean: 86.1-93.1%) at the lumbar spine area. Corresponding specificity values were 60.6 (95% CI for the mean: 57.9-63.3%) and 64.2% (95% CI for the mean: 61.4-66.9%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 29 at the femoral neck to 39.2% at the lumbar spine, while the corresponding negative predictive values (NPVs) reached 96.5 and 96.2%, respectively. Based on this cutoff value, the area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (95% CI for the mean: 0.847-0.882) for the lumbar spine and 0.814 (95% CI for the mean: 0.793-0.833) for the femoral neck. We conclude that the OPERA is a free and effective method for identifying Italian postmenopausal women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Its use could facilitate the appropriate and more cost-effective use of bone densitometry in developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549501     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-004-1014-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  75 in total

1.  The osteoporosis risk assessment tool: establishing content validity through a panel of experts.

Authors:  Christine A Wynd; Michelle Atkins Schaefer
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; C Cepollaro; A Del Puente; S Giannini; S Gonnelli; D Maggio; C Marcocci; S Minisola; E Palummeri; M Rossini; L Sartori; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Direct clinical and welfare costs of osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women.

Authors:  A Randell; P N Sambrook; T V Nguyen; H Lapsley; G Jones; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Intensive and prolonged health promotion strategy may increase awareness of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Tellier; J De Maeseneer; L De Prins; W B Sedrine; C Gosset; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980's.

Authors:  B L White; W D Fisher; C A Laurin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

7.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Clinical decision rules in rheumatoid arthritis: do they identify patients at high risk for osteoporosis? Testing clinical criteria in a population based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis recruited from the Oslo Rheumatoid Arthritis Register.

Authors:  G Haugeberg; R E Ørstavik; T Uhlig; J A Falch; J I Halse; T K Kvien
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study.

Authors:  F D Wolinsky; J F Fitzgerald; T E Stump
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  14 in total

1.  Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Cemal Bes; Melih Güven; Budak Akman; Evren Fehmi Atay; Emrah Ceviz; Mehmet Soy
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  [Evaluation of screening accuracy on osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians and its cut-off value in healthy physical examination population].

Authors:  P Wang; H Wu; Y Che; D W Fan; J Liu; L Y Tao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-12-18

3.  Development and validation of a tool for identifying women with low bone mineral density and low-impact fractures: the São Paulo Osteoporosis Risk Index (SAPORI).

Authors:  M M Pinheiro; E T Reis Neto; F S Machado; F Omura; J Szejnfeld; V L Szejnfeld
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The soy isoflavones for reducing bone loss (SIRBL) study: a 3-y randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D Lee Alekel; Marta D Van Loan; Kenneth J Koehler; Laura N Hanson; Jeanne W Stewart; Kathy B Hanson; Mindy S Kurzer; C Theodore Peterson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Development and validation of osteoporosis risk-assessment model for Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sun Min Oh; Byung-Ho Nam; Yumie Rhee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Deog Young Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Diagnostic value of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in detecting high-risk populations for osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Zha; Yu Hu; Xiao-Na Pang; Gui-Lin Chang; Li Li
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Validation of the Dutch guidelines for dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement.

Authors:  Noortje A Verdijk; Arnold C Romeijnders; Jos J Ruskus; Corien van der Sluijs; Victor J Pop
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Performance of simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation in a sample of women with suspected osteoporosis in the Turkish population.

Authors:  M Karkucak; E Capkin; S Kerimoglu; M Serdaroglu; M Topbas; H Yildiz; M Guler
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  [RheumaCheck: development and evaluation of a German language screening instrument for rheumatic diseases].

Authors:  Jutta G Richter; Ewa Wessel; Ralf Klimt; Reinhardt Willers; Matthias Schneider
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Development and validation of the self-administered Fibromyalgia Assessment Status: a disease-specific composite measure for evaluating treatment effect.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Rita Girolimetti; Stefania Gasparini; Fabiola Atzeni; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.