Literature DB >> 18300976

Internal distraction osteogenesis in mandibular reconstruction: clinical experience in 10 cases.

Raúl González-Garcia1, Pilar Rubio-Bueno, Luis Naval-Gías, Francisco J Rodríguez-Campo, Verónica Escorial-Hernández, Pedro L Martos, Mario F Muñoz-Guerra, Jesús Sastre-Pérez, José L Gil-Diez Usandizaga, Francisco J Diaz-González.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis has been used for reconstruction of bone and soft-tissue defects. The authors present their clinical experience in the reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects by means of internal distraction osteogenesis.
METHODS: Ten patients with mandibular defects ranging from 30 to 80 mm in length were treated in the authors' department. Internal distraction devices with transcutaneous activators were placed immediately after complete resection of the affected bone. Distraction was initiated 10 days after surgery at a rate of 0.5 mm/day. The consolidation period ranged from 12 to 22 weeks. Finally, the distractor device was removed. In two patients, an additional iliac crest bone graft was needed to complete bone union.
RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 4 to 47 months after surgery. Partial cutaneous and intraoral exposure was observed in two patients. At the end of the follow-up period, successful distraction osteogenesis was achieved in eight patients. Six patients were alive and free of disease, whereas two patients showed local relapse and required new resective surgery. Complete intraoral exposure with failure of the distraction process was observed in one patient, whereas another patient did not complete distraction because of metastatic disease diagnosed 4 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Good clinical results for reconstruction of mandibular and soft-tissue postablative defects are reported with the use of this technique. The use of semiburied devices provides better aesthetics and acceptable quality of life to the patients. Larger series are required to popularize the use of this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18300976     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000297640.65255.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Lucy K Nagashima; Michelle Rondon-Newby; Ibrahim E Zakhary; William W Nagy; Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman; Mohammed E Elsalanty
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Curvilinear Segmental Mandibular Reconstruction Utilizing Distraction Osteogenesis and Early Open Callus Manipulation.

Authors:  Alberto Rocha Pereira; Paulo Neves; José Rosa; Scott Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-01-24

4.  Wide Excision with Immediate Reconstruction of the Mandible Using Free Fibular Flap in Ameloblastoma of the Mandible-A Need of Time: Our Experience of 37 Cases.

Authors:  Hemant A Saraiya
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-11-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.