Literature DB >> 8793746

Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance.

D A Winter1, F Prince, J S Frank, C Powell, K F Zabjek.   

Abstract

1. Control of posture in quiet stance has been quantified by center of pressure (COP) changes in the anterior-posterior (A/P) and medial-lateral (M/L) directions from a single force platform. Recording from a single force platform, researchers are unable to recognize two separate mechanisms that become evident when two force platforms are used. Depending on the stance position taken, many combinations of an ankle mechanism and a hip (load/unload) mechanism are evident. In side-by-side stance, A/P balance is totally under ankle (plantar/dorsiflexor) control, whereas M/L balance is under hip (abductor/adductor) control. In tandem stance, the A/P balance is dominated by the hip mechanism, with mixed and small or sometimes negligible contributions by the ankle plantar/dorsiflexors: for M/L balance, the reverse is evident; ankle invertors/evertors dominate, with mixed and small contribution from the hip load/unload mechanism. In an intermediate 45 degrees stance position, both ankle and hip mechanisms contribute to the net balance control in totally different ways. In the M/L direction the two strategies reinforce, whereas in the A/P direction the ankle mechanism must overcome and cancel most of the inappropriate contribution by the hip load/unload mechanism. A spatial plot of the separate mechanisms reveals the fact that the random-looking COP scatter plot is nothing more than a spatial and temporal summation of two separate spatial plots. A straight line joining the individual COPs under each foot is the load/unload line controlled by the hip mechanism. At right angles to this load/unload line in the side-by-side and tandem positions is the independent control line by the ankle muscles. In an intermediate standing position, the separate control lines exist, but now the ankle control is not orthogonal to the load/unload line; rather, it acts at an angle of approximately 60 degrees. The direction of these ankle control and load/unload lines also allows us to pinpoint the muscle groups responsible at the ankle and hip in any of the stance positions.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8793746     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  227 in total

1.  Analysis of postural sway using entropy measures of signal complexity.

Authors:  A M Sabatini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Experimental knee pain impairs postural stability during quiet stance but not after perturbations.

Authors:  Rogério Pessoto Hirata; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Shinichiro Shiozawa; Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Bipedal distribution of human vestibular-evoked postural responses during asymmetrical standing.

Authors:  J F Marsden; J Castellote; B L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Analysis of human postural responses to recoverable falls.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; P DiZio; E Rabin; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural control in athletes participating in an ironman triathlon.

Authors:  Edit Nagy; Kalman Toth; Gabor Janositz; Gyula Kovacs; Anna Feher-Kiss; Lajos Angyan; Gyöngyi Horvath
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Feature selection of stabilometric parameters based on principal component analysis.

Authors:  L Rocchi; L Chiari; A Cappello
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Foot placement alters the mechanisms of postural control while standing and reaching.

Authors:  Jason C Gillette; James J Abbas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Asymmetry of recurrent dynamics as a function of postural stance.

Authors:  Adam C King; Zheng Wang; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Anticipatory postural adjustments in children with typical motor development.

Authors:  Gay L Girolami; Takako Shiratori; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of asymmetrical stance and movement on body rotation in pushing.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.