Literature DB >> 18296979

The impact of different warm-up protocols on vertical jump performance in male collegiate athletes.

Brady W Holt1, Kate Lambourne.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of different types of warm-up on countermovement vertical jump (VJ) performance. Sixty-four male Division I collegiate football players completed a pretest for VJ height. The participants were then randomly assigned to a warm-up only condition, a warm-up plus static stretching condition, a warm-up plus dynamic stretching condition, or a warm-up plus dynamic flexibility condition. VJ performance was tested immediately after the completion of the warm-up. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < .05) in VJ performance between the warm-up groups. Posttest jump performance improved in all groups; however, the mean for the static stretching group was significantly lower than the means for the other 3 groups. The static stretching negated the benefits gained from a general warm-up when performed immediately before a VJ test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18296979     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f9d6a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  18 in total

1.  The effect of different dynamic stretch velocities on jump performance.

Authors:  Iain M Fletcher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Running versus strength-based warm-up: acute effects on isometric knee extension function.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; Yvan Carbonnel; Robin Candau; Grégoire Millet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Short Durations of Static Stretching when Combined with Dynamic Stretching do not Impair Repeated Sprints and Agility.

Authors:  Del P Wong; Anis Chaouachi; Patrick W C Lau; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Effects of dynamic and static stretching within general and activity specific warm-up protocols.

Authors:  Michael Samson; Duane C Button; Anis Chaouachi; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Stretch and sprint training reduces stretch-induced sprint performance deficits in 13- to 15-year-old youth.

Authors:  A Chaouachi; K Chamari; P Wong; C Castagna; M Chaouachi; I Moussa-Chamari; D G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Recovery in soccer: part I - post-match fatigue and time course of recovery.

Authors:  Mathieu Nédélec; Alan McCall; Chris Carling; Franck Legall; Serge Berthoin; Gregory Dupont
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Effects of stretching on performances involving stretch-shortening cycles.

Authors:  Heidi Kallerud; Nigel Gleeson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Warm-Up Intensity and Time Course Effects on Jump Performance.

Authors:  Ryo Tsurubami; Kensuke Oba; Mina Samukawa; Kazuki Takizawa; Itaru Chiba; Masanori Yamanaka; Harukazu Tohyama
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reid; Rebecca Greene; James D Young; Daniel D Hodgson; Anthony J Blazevich; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.