Literature DB >> 18295993

Improving performance in noise for hearing aids and cochlear implants using coherent modulation filtering.

Jong Ho Won1, Steven M Schimmel, Ward R Drennan, Pamela E Souza, Les Atlas, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the maximal attainable performance of speech enhancement strategies based on coherent modulation filtering. An optimal adaptive coherent modulation filtering algorithm was designed to enhance known signals from a target talker in two-talker babble noise. The algorithm was evaluated in a closed-set, speech-recognition-in-noise task. The speech reception threshold (SRT) was measured using a one-down, one-up adaptive procedure. Five hearing-impaired subjects and five cochlear implant users were tested in three processing conditions: (1) original sounds; (2) fixed coherent modulation filtered sounds; and (3) optimal coherent modulation filtered sounds. Six normal-hearing subjects were tested with a 6-channel cochlear implant simulation of sounds processed in the same three conditions. Significant improvements in SRTs were observed when the signal was processed with the optimal coherent modulation filtering algorithm. There was no benefit when the signal was processed with the fixed modulation filter. The current study suggested that coherent modulation filtering might be a promising method for front-end processing in hearing aids and cochlear implants. An approach such as hidden Markov models could be used to generalize the optimal coherent modulation filtering algorithm to unknown utterances and to extend it to open-set speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295993      PMCID: PMC2441638          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

Review 1.  Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Neural representations of sinusoidal amplitude and frequency modulations in the primary auditory cortex of awake primates.

Authors:  Li Liang; Thomas Lu; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception.

Authors:  O Ghitza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Unit responses in the rat cochlear nucleus to tones of rapidly varying frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  A R Moller
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1971-04

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Frequency and periodicity are represented in orthogonal maps in the human auditory cortex: evidence from magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  G Langner; M Sams; P Heil; H Schulze
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christopher G Clinard; Seeyoun Kwon; Vasant K Dasika; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Kelly L Tremblay; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-27

2.  Initial development of a spatially separated speech-in-noise and localization training program.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Infrared neural stimulation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Suhrud Rajguru; Mark Bendett
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-08

4.  Single-centre experience and practical considerations of the benefit of a second cochlear implant in bilaterally deaf adults.

Authors:  Dominik Péus; Andreas Pfluger; Sophia Marie Häussler; Steffen Knopke; Manuel Christoph Ketterer; Agnieszka J Szczepek; Stefan Gräbel; Heidi Olze
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.