Literature DB >> 18293111

Characterization of chromosome structures of Falconinae (Falconidae, Falconiformes, Aves) by chromosome painting and delineation of chromosome rearrangements during their differentiation.

Chizuko Nishida1, Junko Ishijima, Ayumi Kosaka, Hideyuki Tanabe, Felix A Habermann, Darren K Griffin, Yoichi Matsuda.   

Abstract

Karyotypes of most bird species are characterized by around 2n = 80 chromosomes, comprising 7-10 pairs of large- and medium-sized macrochromosomes including sex chromosomes and numerous morphologically indistinguishable microchromosomes. The Falconinae of the Falconiformes has a different karyotype from the typical avian karyotype in low chromosome numbers, little size difference between macrochromosomes and a smaller number of microchromosomes. To characterize chromosome structures of Falconinae and to delineate the chromosome rearrangements that occurred in this subfamily, we conducted comparative chromosome painting with chicken chromosomes 1-9 and Z probes and microchromosome-specific probes, and chromosome mapping of the 18S-28S rRNA genes and telomeric (TTAGGG)( n ) sequences for common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) (2n = 52), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) (2n = 50) and merlin (Falco columbarius) (2n = 40). F. tinnunculus had the highest number of chromosomes and was considered to retain the ancestral karyotype of Falconinae; one and six centric fusions might have occurred in macrochromosomes of F. peregrinus and F. columbarius, respectively. Tandem fusions of microchromosomes to macrochromosomes and between microchromosomes were also frequently observed, and chromosomal locations of the rRNA genes ranged from two to seven pairs of chromosomes. These karyotypic features of Falconinae were relatively different from those of Accipitridae, indicating that the drastic chromosome rearrangements occurred independently in the lineages of Accipitridae and Falconinae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18293111     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1210-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  33 in total

1.  Micro- and macrochromosome paints generated by flow cytometry and microdissection: tools for mapping the chicken genome.

Authors:  D K Griffin; F Haberman; J Masabanda; P O'Brien; M Bagga; A Sazanov; J Smith; D W Burt; M Ferguson-Smith; J Wienberg
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1999

2.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Comparative chromosome painting of chicken autosomal paints 1-9 in nine different bird species.

Authors:  M Guttenbach; I Nanda; W Feichtinger; J S Masabanda; D K Griffin; M Schmid
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Heather R L Lerner; David P Mindell
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Extensive gross genomic rearrangements between chicken and Old World vultures (Falconiformes: Accipitridae).

Authors:  I Nanda; E Karl; V Volobouev; D K Griffin; M Schartl; M Schmid
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Chromosomal polymorphism and comparative painting analysis in the zebra finch.

Authors:  Yuichiro Itoh; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  High chromosome conservation detected by comparative chromosome painting in chicken, pigeon and passerine birds.

Authors:  Svetlana Derjusheva; Anna Kurganova; Felix Habermann; Elena Gaginskaya
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Comparative painting reveals strong chromosome homology over 80 million years of bird evolution.

Authors:  S Shetty; D K Griffin; J A Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosome rearrangements between chicken and guinea fowl defined by comparative chromosome painting and FISH mapping of DNA clones.

Authors:  M Shibusawa; C Nishida-Umehara; J Masabanda; D K Griffin; T Isobe; Y Matsuda
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  The molecular basis of chromosome orthologies and sex chromosomal differentiation in palaeognathous birds.

Authors:  Chizuko Nishida-Umehara; Yayoi Tsuda; Junko Ishijima; Junko Ando; Atushi Fujiwara; Yoichi Matsuda; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 4.620

View more
  30 in total

1.  Global patterns of apparent copy number variation in birds revealed by cross-species comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Benjamin M Skinner; Abdullah Al Mutery; Deborah Smith; Martin Völker; Nilofour Hojjat; Sannaa Raja; Steven Trim; Peter Houde; William J Boecklen; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Novel tools for characterising inter and intra chromosomal rearrangements in avian microchromosomes.

Authors:  Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O'Connor; Deborah Smith; Gothami Fonseka; Abdullah Al Mutery; Claudia Rathje; Richard Frodsham; Patricia O'Brien; Fumio Kasai; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Benjamin M Skinner; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Intrachromosomal rearrangements in avian genome evolution: evidence for regions prone to breakpoints.

Authors:  B M Skinner; D K Griffin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Reciprocal chromosome painting between white hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) and chicken reveals extensive fusions and fissions during karyotype evolution of accipitridae (Aves, Falconiformes).

Authors:  Edivaldo H Correa de Oliveira; Marcella M Tagliarini; Jorge Dores Rissino; Julio C Pieczarka; Cleusa Y Nagamachi; Patricia C M O'Brien; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes)--an atypical species with low diploid number.

Authors:  Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Bee L Ng; Beiyuan Fu; Vitaly Volobouev; Nigel P Carter; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Molecular cytogenetics of the california condor: evolutionary and conservation implications.

Authors:  W S Modi; M Romanov; E D Green; O Ryder
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromosomes in chicken.

Authors:  Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; John W M Bastiaansen; Hindrik H D Kerstens; Albart Coster; Ruud Jalving; Addie Vereijken; Pradeepa Silva; William M Muir; Hans H Cheng; Olivier Hanotte; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Maintenance of syntenic groups between Cathartidae and Gallus gallus indicates symplesiomorphic karyotypes in new world vultures.

Authors:  Marcella M Tagliarini; Patricia C M O'Brien; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Edivaldo H C de Oliveira
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Karyotype Evolution and Genomic Organization of Repetitive DNAs in the Saffron Finch, Sicalis flaveola (Passeriformes, Aves).

Authors:  Rafael Kretschmer; Benilson Silva Rodrigues; Suziane Alves Barcellos; Alice Lemos Costa; Marcelo de Bello Cioffi; Analía Del Valle Garnero; Ricardo José Gunski; Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de Oliveira; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor.

Authors:  Michael N Romanov; Marta Farré; Pamela E Lithgow; Katie E Fowler; Benjamin M Skinner; Rebecca O'Connor; Gothami Fonseka; Niclas Backström; Yoichi Matsuda; Chizuko Nishida; Peter Houde; Erich D Jarvis; Hans Ellegren; David W Burt; Denis M Larkin; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.