Literature DB >> 18292432

Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device.

Jochen Mayer1, Joachim Boldt, Michael W Wolf, Johannes Lang, Stefan Suttner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The performance of a recently introduced, arterial waveform-based device for measuring cardiac output (CO) without the need of invasive calibration (FloTrac/Vigileo) has been controversial. We designed the present study to assess the validity of an improved version of this monitoring technique compared with intermittent thermodilution CO measurement using a pulmonary artery catheter in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Forty ASA III patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied. Simultaneous CO measurements by bolus thermodilution and the FloTrac/Vigileo device were obtained after induction of anesthesia (T1), before CPB (T2), after CPB (T3), after sternal closure (T4), on arrival in the intensive care unit (T5), 4 h (T6), 8 h (T7), and 24 h after surgery (T8). CO was indexed to the body surface area (cardiac index, CI). A percentage error of 30% or less was established as the criterion for method interchangeability.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-two data pairs were analyzed. Thermodilution CI ranged from 1.2 to 4.1 L x min(-1) x m(-2) (mean 2.5 +/- 0.54 L x min(-1) x m(-2)). Bias and precision (1.96 sd of the bias) were 0.19 L x min(-1) x m(-2) and +/- 0.60 L x min(-1) x m(-2), resulting in an overall percentage error of 24.6%. Subgroup analysis revealed a percentage error of 28.3% for data pairs obtained intraoperatively (T1-4) and 20.7% in intensive care unit (T5-8).
CONCLUSION: CI values obtained by the improved, second generation semiinvasive arterial waveform device showed good intraoperative and postoperative agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution CI measurements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18292432     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161964d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  27 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Gino Zadeii; Samuel Congello; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-24

4.  Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients.

Authors:  Murali Chakravarthy; Subramanyam Rajeev; Vivek Jawali
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Compressing the non-dependent lung during one-lung ventilation improves arterial oxygenation, but impairs systemic oxygen delivery by decreasing cardiac output.

Authors:  Seiji Ishikawa; Madoka Shirasawa; Michiko Fujisawa; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Koshi Makita
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jochen Mayer; Joachim Boldt; Andinet M Mengistu; Kerstin D Röhm; Stefan Suttner
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jan Benes; Ivan Chytra; Pavel Altmann; Marek Hluchy; Eduard Kasal; Roman Svitak; Richard Pradl; Martin Stepan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Anselmo Gil Cano; Juan Carlos Díaz Monrové
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.