Literature DB >> 18291985

Statistical models of partial volume effect.

P Santago1, H D Gage.   

Abstract

Statistical models of partial volume effect for systems with various types of noise or pixel value distributions are developed and probability density functions are derived. The models assume either Gaussian system sampling noise or intrinsic material variances with Gaussian or Poisson statistics. In particular, a material can be viewed as having a distinct value that has been corrupted by additive noise either before or after partial volume mixing, or the material could have nondistinct values with a Poisson distribution as might be the case in nuclear medicine images. General forms of the probability density functions are presented for the N material cases and particular forms for two- and three-material cases are derived. These models are incorporated into finite mixture densities in order to more accurately model the distribution of image pixel values. Examples are presented using simulated histograms to demonstrate the efficacy of the models for quantification. Modeling of partial volume effect is shown to be useful when one of the materials is present in images mainly as a pixel component.

Year:  1995        PMID: 18291985     DOI: 10.1109/83.469934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  13 in total

1.  Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.

Authors:  Juan D Gispert; Santiago Reig; Javier Pascau; Juan J Vaquero; Pedro García-Barreno; Manuel Desco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Generalized method for partial volume estimation and tissue segmentation in cerebral magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  April Khademi; Anastasios Venetsanopoulos; Alan R Moody
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-04-23

3.  Genetic algorithms for finite mixture model based voxel classification in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka; Evgeny Krestyannikov; Ivo D Dinov; Allan MacKenzie Graham; David W Shattuck; Ulla Ruotsalainen; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Partial volume effect modeling for segmentation and tissue classification of brain magnetic resonance images: A review.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28

5.  Bi-exponential magnetic resonance signal model for partial volume computation.

Authors:  Quentin Duché; Oscar Acosta; Giulio Gambarota; Isabelle Merlet; Olivier Salvado; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

6.  Non-compact myocardium assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance: dependence on image analysis method.

Authors:  Vincenzo Positano; Antonella Meloni; Francesca Macaione; Maria Filomena Santarelli; Laura Pistoia; Andrea Barison; Salvatore Novo; Alessia Pepe
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Brain MRI tissue classification based on local Markov random fields.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka; Ivo D Dinov; David W Shattuck; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  An EM approach to MAP solution of segmenting tissue mixture percentages with application to CT-based virtual colonoscopy.

Authors:  Su Wang; Lihong Li; Harris Cohen; Seth Mankes; John J Chen; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  An EM approach to MAP solution of segmenting tissue mixtures: a numerical analysis.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Su Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Comparison of breast tissue measurements using magnetic resonance imaging, digital mammography and a mathematical algorithm.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Raleigh F Johnson; Fatima Nayeem; Donald G Brunder; Hyunsu Ju; Morton H Leonard; James J Grady; Tuenchit Khamapirad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.