Literature DB >> 18288990

DNA damage repair and response proteins as targets for cancer therapy.

Howard B Lieberman1.   

Abstract

The cellular response to DNA damage is critical for determining whether carcinogenesis, cell death or other deleterious biological effects will ensue. Numerous cellular enzymatic mechanisms can directly repair damaged DNA, or allow tolerance of DNA lesions, and thus reduce potential harmful effects. These processes include base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, nonhomologous end joining, homologous recombinational repair and mismatch repair, as well as translesion synthesis. Furthermore, DNA damage-inducible cell cycle checkpoint systems transiently delay cell cycle progression. Presumably, this allows extra time for repair before entry of cells into critical phases of the cell cycle, an event that could be lethal if pursued with damaged DNA. When damage is excessive apoptotic cellular suicide mechanisms can be induced. Many of the survival-promoting pathways maintain genomic integrity even in the absence of exogenous agents, thus likely processing spontaneous damage caused by the byproducts of normal cellular metabolism. DNA damage can initiate cancer, and radiological as well as chemical agents used to treat cancer patients often cause DNA damage. Many genes are involved in each of the DNA damage processing mechanisms, and the encoded proteins could ultimately serve as targets for therapy, with the goal of neutralizing their ability to repair damage in cancer cells. Therefore, modulation of DNA damage responses coupled with more conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy approaches could sensitize cancer cells to treatment. Alteration of DNA damage response genes and proteins should thus be considered an important though as of yet not fully exploited avenue to enhance cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18288990     DOI: 10.2174/092986708783497328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  34 in total

Review 1.  Overview of base excision repair biochemistry.

Authors:  Yun-Jeong Kim; David M Wilson
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.339

2.  Hdac3 is essential for the maintenance of chromatin structure and genome stability.

Authors:  Srividya Bhaskara; Sarah K Knutson; Guochun Jiang; Mahesh B Chandrasekharan; Andrew J Wilson; Siyuan Zheng; Ashwini Yenamandra; Kimberly Locke; Jia-Ling Yuan; Alyssa R Bonine-Summers; Christina E Wells; Jonathan F Kaiser; M Kay Washington; Zhongming Zhao; Florence F Wagner; Zu-Wen Sun; Fen Xia; Edward B Holson; Dineo Khabele; Scott W Hiebert
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  DNA damage response genes and the development of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine: not mere biomarker for oxidative stress, but remedy for oxidative stress-implicated gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  Chan-Young Ock; Eun-Hee Kim; Duck Joo Choi; Ho Jae Lee; Ki-Baik Hahm; Myung Hee Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Association between genetic variants in the base excision repair pathway and outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantations.

Authors:  Bharat Thyagarajan; Bruce Lindgren; Saonli Basu; Sriharsha Nagaraj; Myron D Gross; Daniel J Weisdorf; Mukta Arora
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Proteomic dissection of cell type-specific H2AX-interacting protein complex associated with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoli Yang; Peng Zou; Jun Yao; Dong Yun; Huimin Bao; Ruyun Du; Jing Long; Xian Chen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Prostate cancer: unmet clinical needs and RAD9 as a candidate biomarker for patient management.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman; Alex J Rai; Richard A Friedman; Kevin M Hopkins; Constantinos G Broustas
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 8.  Impaired DNA damage response--an Achilles' heel sensitizing cancer to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  The radiosensitizing effect of Ku70/80 knockdown in MCF10A cells irradiated with X-rays and p(66)+Be(40) neutrons.

Authors:  Veerle Vandersickel; Monica Mancini; Jacobus Slabbert; Emanuela Marras; Hubert Thierens; Gianpaolo Perletti; Anne Vral
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Dynamic coregulatory complex containing BRCA1, E2F1 and CtIP controls ATM transcription.

Authors:  Cristian Moiola; Paola De Luca; Javier Cotignola; Kevin Gardner; Elba Vazquez; Adriana De Siervi
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2012-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.