Literature DB >> 18288555

Comparison of pelvic radiographs in weightbearing and supine positions.

Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann1, Christian-Dominik Peterlein, Carsten O Tibesku, Stuart L Weinstein.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We asked whether radiographic angles and signs of hip osteoarthrosis differ between radiographs of the pelvis taken in standing and supine positions. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 61 patients (72 hips) with developmental dislocation of the hip. The minimum followup after closed reduction was 15 years (mean, 44 years; range, 15-64 years). We used pelvic radiographs in supine and standing positions taken at the same time and determined the following parameters: minimal joint space width, acetabular roof obliquity (AC angle), depth of the acetabulum (ACM angle), and center-edge angle. Osteoarthrosis was assessed according to Kellgren and Lawrence. Two independent observers measured all radiographs manually with a goniometer. AC angle, center-edge angle, and minimum joint space width differed between the radiographs taken in supine and standing positions at followup, whereas osteoarthrosis grading and the ACM angle did not. The AC angle depended on patient position and predicted development of osteoarthrosis. The minimum joint space width was influenced by the radiographic position with greater values in the supine position. ACM angle and the osteoarthrosis grade according to Kellgren and Lawrence were unaffected by the patient's position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18288555      PMCID: PMC2504670          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0124-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  13 in total

Review 1.  Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; R Schoeniger; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [On changes in the acetabular vault angle of the hip joint in rotated and tilted positions of the pelvis in children].

Authors:  D TOENNIS
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1962-12

5.  [Sources of error in the roentgen evaluation of the hip in infancy].

Authors:  F Ball; K Kommenda
Journal:  Ann Radiol (Paris)       Date:  1968

Review 6.  Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) and hip dysplasia.

Authors:  S L Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Differentiation of normal and pathological acetabular roof angle in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia. Evaluation of 2294 acetabular roof angles of hip joints in children].

Authors:  D Tönnis; D Brunken
Journal:  Arch Orthop Unfallchir       Date:  1968

8.  Classic. Translation: Hilgenreiner on congenital hip dislocation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 9.  Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip. Functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years.

Authors:  T A Malvitz; S L Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the ipsilateral knee more than 40 years after successful closed reduction of DDH.

Authors:  Christian-Dominik Peterlein; Markus Schofer; Carsten O Tibesku; Stuart L Weinstein; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.

Authors:  Miguel O Castro; Vasco V Mascarenhas; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Florian Schmaranzer; Reto Sutter; Ara Kassarjian; Luca Sconfienza; Michael Dienst; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Source-to-detector distance and beam center do not affect radiographic measurements of acetabular morphology.

Authors:  Ashton H Goldman; Kevin B Hoover
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Functional acetabular orientation varies between supine and standing radiographs: implications for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  James R Ross; Eric P Tannenbaum; Jeffrey J Nepple; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Reliability of radiographic parameters in adults with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Terje Terjesen; Ragnhild B Gunderson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Comparing the supine and erect pelvis radiographic examinations: an evaluation of anatomy, image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Kevin Flintham; Kholoud Alzyoud; Andrew England; Peter Hogg; Beverly Snaith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  Full-length standing radiographs can be used for determination of the Femoral neck-shaft angle but not acetabular coverage.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Christian Konrads; Annika Steinmeier; Max Ettinger; Henning Windhagen; Gregor M Giebel
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-08-24

8.  Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Allows the Reliable Assessment of Deformity Correction during Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Johannes Christian Reichert; André Hofer; Georg Matziolis; Georgi Iwan Wassilew
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Lateral acetabular coverage as a predictor of femoroacetabular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Zachary R Ashwell; Jonathan Flug; Vivek Chadayammuri; Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Tigran Garabekyan; Omer Mei-Dan
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.