Literature DB >> 10644319

A prospective audit against national standards of the presentation and management of acute pancreatitis in the South of England.

S K Toh1, S Phillips, C D Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute pancreatitis shows regional variations in the UK. AIMS: To document the incidence and presentation of acute pancreatitis in hospitals in Wessex, and to audit the process and outcome of management of patients against the UK guidelines.
METHODS: A prospective survey was carried out of all patients with acute pancreatitis in a one year period, in eight geographically adjacent acute hospitals in the Wessex region.
RESULTS: 186 patients with acute pancreatitis were identified, an incidence of 152 per million in the adult population. Aetiology was: gallstones 33%, alcohol 20%, idiopathic 32%, other 15%. There were 60 severe cases with 17 deaths. Age and APACHE-II score had significant relations to outcome, but delay to admission, serum amylase level, aetiology, and sex did not. The mortality rate (9.1%) was within the audit standard of 10%. Some management goals were not met: in mild cases, only one third of patients with gallstone pancreatitis had definitive treatment within four weeks. In severe cases, there was poor use of objective severity stratification (19%), low admission rates to a high dependency unit or intensive care unit (67%), and only 33% of patients had computed tomography. Only seven of 17 patients with severe gallstone pancreatitis had an urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of clinically diagnosed acute pancreatitis in England continues to rise. Current management of acute pancreatitis is suboptimal when compared with evidence based UK guidelines but the mortality rate was within the guideline standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10644319      PMCID: PMC1727819          DOI: 10.1136/gut.46.2.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  22 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography and acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  M C Hill; D K Huntington
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  United Kingdom guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Variations in the incidence and the spatial distribution of patients with primary acute pancreatitis in Nottingham 1969-76.

Authors:  J B Bourke; J A Giggs; D S Ebdon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  A controlled trial of Trasylol in the treatment of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J E Trapnell; C C Rigby; C H Talbot; E H Duncan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Acute pancreatitis: the value of life.

Authors:  D C Carter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  W Steinberg; S Tenner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Pancreatic necrosis: assessment of outcome related to quality of life and cost of management.

Authors:  D Fenton-Lee; C W Imrie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Good long-term results in patients surviving severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  M Doepel; J Eriksson; L Halme; T Kumpulainen; K Höckerstedt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992.

Authors:  E L Bradley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

10.  Surgical treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  C Wilson; C S McArdle; D C Carter; C W Imrie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  45 in total

1.  Implementation of a novel emergency surgical unit significantly improves the management of gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  S Bokhari; M Kulendran; L Liasis; K Qurashi; M Sen; S Gould
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Failure to follow evidence-based best practice guidelines in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Adrian C Vlada; Bradley Schmit; Andrew Perry; Jose G Trevino; Kevin E Behrns; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Population-based observational study of acute pancreatitis in southern England.

Authors:  Alex Mirnezami; Ben Knight; Brendan Moran; Fergus Noble; Graham Branagan; John Primrose; Katherine Pearson; Malcolm West; Nathan Curtis; Phil Pucher; Ramsey Cuttress; Sian Pugh; Tim Underwood
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on severity of acute pancreatitis and pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  K A Baxter; P H Pucher; D P Berry; H Elberm; M Abu-Hilal; G Marangoni; Zzr Hamady
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Lung ultrasonography as a direct measure of evolving respiratory dysfunction and disease severity in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Christos Skouras; Zoe A Davis; Joanne Sharkey; Rowan W Parks; O James Garden; John T Murchison; Damian J Mole
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Cholecystectomy During Index Admission for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Lowers 30-Day Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Andrew J Kruger; Nishi Patel; Alice Hinton; Dhiraj Yadav; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease.

Authors:  C N Parnaby; J T Jenkins; J C Ferguson; B W A Williamson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP).

Authors:  Pandanaboyana Sanjay; Sim Yeeting; Carole Whigham; Hannah Judson; Francesco M Polignano; Iain S Tait
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.