Literature DB >> 18287441

Automated carbon dioxide insufflation for CT colonography: effectiveness of colonic distention in cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing.

So Yeon Kim1, Seong Ho Park, Eugene K Choi, Seung Soo Lee, Kyoung Ho Lee, Jin Cheon Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Hee Cheol Kim, Ah Young Kim, Hyun Kwon Ha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the effectiveness of automated CO2 insufflation in colonic distention for CT colonography (CTC) in patients with severe luminal narrowing by colorectal cancer and preliminarily evaluate its safety performed shortly after colonoscopic polypectomy or biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four patients were examined with colonoscopy and subsequent CTC (time interval, 0-8 days) using automated CO2 insufflation. Thirty-six patients whose colonoscopy was incomplete due to severe luminal narrowing by cancer that prevented colonoscope passage constituted the stenotic group. The remaining 38 patients constituted the nonstenotic group. Colonic distention was graded by two experienced readers from 1 (worst) to 4 (best) and compared between the two groups. Clinical data and CT images were analyzed for the occurrence of colonic perforation.
RESULTS: Distention was not significantly different between the stenotic and nonstenotic groups in any colonic segments in both supine and prone positions. The mean distention grade +/- SD of the colonic segments proximal to the luminal narrowing in the stenotic group (n = 143 segments) was 3.7 +/- 0.7 and 3.8 +/- 0.7 for the supine and prone positions, respectively. Colonic perforation was not noted in any of the 74 patients, including 65 patients who underwent CTC within 24 hours after colonoscopy (62 snare polypectomies, two polypectomies using biopsy forceps, 63 routine mucosal biopsies).
CONCLUSION: Automated pressure-controlled CO2 insufflation is as efficient in colonic distention for CTC in colorectal cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing as it is in patients without severe luminal narrowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18287441     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Initial experience with computed tomographic colonography applied for noncolorectal cancerous conditions.

Authors:  Tamaki Ichikawa; Shuichi Kawada; Satoru Hirata; Shu Ikeda; Yuuki Sato; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Nurhee Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Objective volumetric comparison of room air versus carbon dioxide for colonic distention at screening CT colonography.

Authors:  James L Patrick; Joshua R Bakke; Peter Bannas; David H Kim; Meghan G Lubner; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-02

5.  CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Jiri Jahoda; Gabriela Grusova; Pavel Hrabak; Ales Novotny; Andrea Burgetova
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Jaap Stoker; Onofre Alarcon; Federico Barbaro; Davide Bellini; Michael Bretthauer; Margriet C De Haan; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Monika Ferlitsch; Steve Halligan; Emma Helbren; Mikael Hellstrom; Ernst J Kuipers; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Emanuele Neri; Lucio Petruzziello; Andrew Plumb; Daniele Regge; Stuart A Taylor; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Advances in CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Stefanie Weinstein; Tara Morgan; Patrick Alore; Rizwan Aslam
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.