Literature DB >> 32116218

CT colonography has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.

Lukas Lambert1, Jiri Jahoda1, Gabriela Grusova2, Pavel Hrabak2, Ales Novotny2, Andrea Burgetova1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the detection of internal hemorrhoids.
METHODS: Three gastroenterologists systematically reported on the presence of internal hemorrhoids in patients with incomplete colonoscopy, for whom they considered a subsequent CTC. For 44 patients with internal hemorrhoids revealed by optical colonoscopy, an age- and gender-matched cohort of 66 patients with normal findings in the rectum was selected. Endoluminal and transaxial CTC views of the rectum were evaluated for the presence of internal hemorrhoids, the anal verge prominence, asymmetry, and cushion-like appearance on a Likert scale by two experienced radiologists and two gastroenterologists.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for identification of internal hemorrhoids were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53-0.68), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70), respectively. The radiologists showed a better specificity, the gastroenterologists a slightly better sensitivity. When only the rating "very likely" was considered as positive, the specificity rose to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62). The interobserver agreement was fair. The best predictor of the presence of hemorrhoids was a prominent anal verge in the supine position (OR=1.789, 95% CI, 1.267-2.525). The difference between supine and prone positions in the evaluated features in patients with internal hemorrhoids was not significant.
CONCLUSION: CTC has low sensitivity but high specificity in the detection of internal hemorrhoids, if the rater is confident in detecting them. Internal hemorrhoids do not substantially change their shape between prone and supine positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32116218      PMCID: PMC7051267          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  16 in total

1.  The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults.

Authors:  Stefan Riss; Friedrich Anton Weiser; Katrin Schwameis; Thomas Riss; Martina Mittlböck; Gottfried Steiner; Anton Stift
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  CT colonography: positioning order and intracolonic pressure.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Jacob Bar-Ziv; Eugene Libson; Merab Eligulashvili; Arye Blachar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Submilisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography using iterative reconstruction technique: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Jan Danes; Jiri Jahoda; Martin Masek; Jiri Lisy; Petr Ourednicek
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Internal hemorrhoids: diagnosis with double-contrast barium enema examinations.

Authors:  M S Levine; L W Kam; S E Rubesin; O Ekberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  What every gastroenterologist needs to know about common anorectal disorders.

Authors:  Moonkyung Cho Schubert; Subbaramiah Sridhar; Robert R Schade; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps, should they be removed during anal fissure surgery?

Authors:  Pravin-J Gupta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  MDCT and CT angiography evaluation of rectal bleeding: the role of volume visualization.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; Karen M Horton; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Test-positive rate at CT colonography is increased by rectal bleeding and/or unexplained weight loss, unlike other common gastrointestinal symptoms.

Authors:  D Hock; R Materne; R Ouhadi; I Mancini; S A Aouachria; A Nchimi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2015-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.