Literature DB >> 18286248

Mobile phones: are children at higher risk?

Norbert Leitgeb1.   

Abstract

The use of mobile phones by children has in recent years been increasing, the onset starting earlier and earlier. This has led to concern about whether children might be at higher risk and whether mobile phone use should even be forbidden. Advice from highly reputed committees on both national and international levels is contradictory and on the whole more confusing than helpful to worried parents and physicians, but this can be explained. It is shown here that different opinions derived from the same database reflect the different way in which uncertainty of knowledge is dealt with. Based on the assessments of the international committee and established knowledge on children's development it can be concluded that existing exposure limits do in fact provide reasonable safety. Compared to adults, however, children do in fact need to be considered at a relatively higher potential risk, depending on their phase of development. If adults are advised to minimise their exposure, this is even more justified for children. However, circular reasoning must be avoided: the uncertainty-triggered application of precaution must not be misinterpreted as evidence for definite risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18286248     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-007-0447-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  12 in total

Review 1.  Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2002

2.  Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro.

Authors:  Elisabeth Diem; Claudia Schwarz; Franz Adlkofer; Oswald Jahn; Hugo Rüdiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Lymphomas in E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHZ electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  M H Repacholi; A Basten; V Gebski; D Noonan; J Finnie; A W Harris
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation.

Authors:  R S Malyapa; E W Ahern; W L Straube; E G Moros; W F Pickard; J L Roti Roti
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts for the United States: improvements to the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics version.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Robert J Kuczmarski; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Shumei Guo; Rong Wei; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Controversial cytogenetic observations in mammalian somatic cells exposed to radiofrequency radiation.

Authors:  Guenter Obe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Leeka Kheifets; Michael Repacholi; Rick Saunders; Emilie van Deventer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells.

Authors:  H Lai; N P Singh
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 10.  Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation.

Authors:  Martin L Meltz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.010

View more
  7 in total

1.  Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields and behavioural problems in Bavarian children and adolescents.

Authors:  Silke Thomas; Sabine Heinrich; Rüdiger von Kries; Katja Radon
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Emerging aspects of mobile phone use.

Authors:  F Samkange-Zeeb; M Blettner
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2009-06-12

Review 3.  Smartphone Overuse and Visual Impairment in Children and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Mei Li; Daqiao Zhu; Yang Cao
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  New Zealand adolescents' cellphone and cordless phone user-habits: are they at increased risk of brain tumours already? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mary Redmayne
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  The pattern of mobile phone use and prevalence of self-reported symptoms in elementary and junior high school students in shiraz, iran.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi; Mohammad Atefi; Fatemeh Kholghi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2011-06

6.  Exposure to mobile telecommunication networks assessed using personal dosimetry and well-being in children and adolescents: the German MobilEe-study.

Authors:  Silke Thomas; Anja Kühnlein; Sabine Heinrich; Georg Praml; Rüdiger von Kries; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Use of wireless telephones and self-reported health symptoms: a population-based study among Swedish adolescents aged 15-19 years.

Authors:  Fredrik Söderqvist; Michael Carlberg; Lennart Hardell
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.