Literature DB >> 33289673

Smartphone Overuse and Visual Impairment in Children and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jian Wang1, Mei Li2, Daqiao Zhu1, Yang Cao3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smartphone overuse has been cited as a potentially modifiable risk factor that can result in visual impairment. However, reported associations between smartphone overuse and visual impairment have been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the association between smartphone overuse and visual impairment, including myopia, blurred vision, and poor vision, in children and young adults.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and ScienceDirect databases since the beginning of the databases up to June 2020. Fourteen eligible studies (10 cross-sectional studies and 4 controlled trials) were identified, which included a total of 27,110 subjects with a mean age ranging from 9.5 to 26.0 years. We used a random-effects model for meta-analysis of the 10 cross-sectional studies (26,962 subjects) and a fixed-effects model for meta-analysis of the 4 controlled trials (148 subjects) to combine odds ratios (ORs) and effect sizes (ES). The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS: A pooled OR of 1.05 (95% CI 0.98-1.13, P=.16) was obtained from the cross-sectional studies, suggesting that smartphone overuse is not significantly associated with myopia, poor vision, or blurred vision; however, these visual impairments together were more apparent in children (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.14, P=.09) than in young adults (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.57-1.46,P=.71). For the 4 controlled trials, the smartphone overuse groups showed worse visual function scores compared with the reduced-use groups. The pooled ES was 0.76 (95% CI 0.53-0.99), which was statistically significant (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Longer smartphone use may increase the likelihood of ocular symptoms, including myopia, asthenopia, and ocular surface disease, especially in children. Thus, regulating use time and restricting the prolonged use of smartphones may prevent ocular and visual symptoms. Further research on the patterns of use, with longer follow up on the longitudinal associations, will help to inform detailed guidelines and recommendations for smartphone use in children and young adults. ©Jian Wang, Mei Li, Daqiao Zhu, Yang Cao. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child; meta-analysis; mobile phone; overuse; smartphone; systematic review; visual impairment; young adult

Year:  2020        PMID: 33289673      PMCID: PMC7755532          DOI: 10.2196/21923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  67 in total

1.  Visual activity before and after the onset of juvenile myopia.

Authors:  Lisa A Jones-Jordan; G Lynn Mitchell; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker; Janene R Sims; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.

Authors:  Bertrand Baujat; Cédric Mahé; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Catherine Hill
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Symptoms associated with reading from a smartphone in conditions of light and dark.

Authors:  Beatriz Antona; Ana Rosa Barrio; Adriana Gascó; Ana Pinar; Mariano González-Pérez; María C Puell
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Parent Perceptions of Mobile Device Use Among Preschool-Aged Children in Rural Head Start Centers.

Authors:  Morgan McCloskey; Susan L Johnson; Cristen Benz; Darcy A Thompson; Barbara Chamberlin; Lauren Clark; Laura L Bellows
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children.

Authors:  Kathryn A Rose; Ian G Morgan; Jenny Ip; Annette Kifley; Son Huynh; Wayne Smith; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and Internet addiction.

Authors:  Sam-Wook Choi; Dai-Jin Kim; Jung-Seok Choi; Heejune Ahn; Eun-Jeung Choi; Won-Young Song; Seohee Kim; Hyunchul Youn
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 9.  A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Piotr Kanclerz; Kazuo Tsubota; Carla Lanca; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Low physical activity and higher use of screen devices are associated with myopia at the age of 16-17 years in the CCC2000 Eye Study.

Authors:  Mathias Hvidtfelt Hansen; Poul Pedersen Laigaard; Else Marie Olsen; Anne Mette Skovgaard; Michael Larsen; Line Kessel; Inger Christine Munch
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.761

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prevalence of refractive errors and risk factors for myopia among schoolchildren of Almaty, Kazakhstan: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ainagul Mukazhanova; Neilya Aldasheva; Juldyz Iskakbayeva; Raushan Bakhytbek; Aliya Ualiyeva; Kaini Baigonova; Damet Ongarbaeva; Denis Vinnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  High prevalence of myopia and low hyperopia reserve in 4411 Chinese primary school students and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Yu Yue; Xianmao Liu; Shu Yi; Bo Liu; Hong Yi; Hong Li
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Mobile phones are hazardous microbial platforms warranting robust public health and biosecurity protocols.

Authors:  Matthew Olsen; Rania Nassar; Abiola Senok; Susan Moloney; Anna Lohning; Peter Jones; Gary Grant; Mark Morgan; Dinesh Palipana; Simon McKirdy; Rashed Alghafri; Lotti Tajouri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Mobile Device Usage before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Rural and Urban Adults.

Authors:  Livia Jonnatan; Cherisse L Seaton; Kathy L Rush; Eric P H Li; Khalad Hasan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Children in Tokyo Have a Long Sustained Axial Length from Age 3 Years: The Tokyo Myopia Study.

Authors:  Tomoki Maruyama; Erisa Yotsukura; Hidemasa Torii; Kiwako Mori; Mikako Inokuchi; Mitsuaki Tokumura; Debabrata Hazra; Mamoru Ogawa; Akiko Hanyuda; Kazuo Tsubota; Toshihide Kurihara; Kazuno Negishi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  The effect of COVID-19 imposed lockdown on Italian children with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Artesani Maria Cristina; Esposito Mariacristina; Sacchetti Marta; Mennini Maurizio; Romanzo Antonino; Buzzonetti Luca; Fiocchi Alessandro Giovanni; Sansone Andrea
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.516

Review 7.  Can Nutrition Play a Role in Ameliorating Digital Eye Strain?

Authors:  Drake W Lem; Dennis L Gierhart; Pinakin Gunvant Davey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.706

8.  Could virtual reality applications pose real risks to children and adolescents? A systematic review of ethical issues and concerns.

Authors:  Polyxeni Kaimara; Andreas Oikonomou; Ioannis Deliyannis
Journal:  Virtual Real       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.697

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.