Literature DB >> 18284346

Cholinergic enhancement eliminates modulation of neural activity by task difficulty in the prefrontal cortex during working memory.

Maura L Furey1, Emiliano Ricciardi, Mark B Schapiro, Stanley I Rapoport, Pietro Pietrini.   

Abstract

Previously, we demonstrated that enhancing cholinergic activity during a working memory (WM) task improves performance and reduces blood flow in the right anterior middle/superior frontal cortex, an area known to be important for WM. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interaction between WM task demands and cholinergic enhancement on neural responses in the prefrontal cortex. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured using H(2)(15)O and positron emission tomography, as 10 young healthy volunteers performed a parametrically varied match-to-sample WM for faces task. For each item, a picture of a face was presented, followed by a delay (1, 6, 11, or 16 sec), then by the presentation of two faces. Subjects were instructed to identify which face they previously had seen. For control items, nonsense pictures were presented in the same spatial and temporal manner. All conditions were performed during an intravenous infusion of saline and physostigmine (1 mg/hr). Subjects were blind to the substance being infused. Reaction time increased significantly with WM delay, and physostigmine decreased reaction time across delay conditions. Significant task-related rCBF increases during saline infusion were seen in superior frontal, middle frontal, and inferior frontal regions, and the response magnitudes in the regions increased systematically with task difficulty. In all of these prefrontal regions, physostigmine administration significantly reduced rCBF during task, particularly at longer task delays, so that no correlation between task delay and rCBF was observed. In the ventral visual cortex, physostigmine increased rCBF at longer task delays in medial regions, and decreased rCBF over delay conditions in lateral cortical areas. These results indicate that, during cholinergic potentiation, brain activity in prefrontal regions is not modulated by increases in WM task demands, and lends further support to the hypothesis that cholinergic modulation enhances visual processing, making the task easier to perform, and thus, compensate for the need to recruit prefrontal cortical regions as task demands increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18284346      PMCID: PMC2956878          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  38 in total

1.  Cholinergic enhancement improves performance on working memory by modulating the functional activity in distinct brain regions: a positron emission tomography regional cerebral blood flow study in healthy humans.

Authors:  M L Furey; P Pietrini; G E Alexander; M B Schapiro; B Horwitz
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Cortical cholinergic inputs mediating arousal, attentional processing and dreaming: differential afferent regulation of the basal forebrain by telencephalic and brainstem afferents.

Authors:  M Sarter; J P Bruno
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent.

Authors:  Seema Sayala; Joseph B Sala; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  D M Barch; T S Braver; L E Nystrom; S D Forman; D C Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Cholinergic enhancement of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat.

Authors:  P C Murphy; A M Sillito
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of attention and emotion on repetition priming and their modulation by cholinergic enhancement.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Patrik Vuilleumier; Christiane M Thiel; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  H Sato; Y Hata; H Masui; T Tsumoto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of cholinergic enhancement on visual stimulation, spatial attention, and spatial working memory.

Authors:  P Bentley; M Husain; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Practice and difficulty evoke anatomically and pharmacologically dissociable brain activation dynamics.

Authors:  Ed Bullmore; John Suckling; Fernando Zelaya; Chris Long; Garry Honey; Laurence Reed; Carol Routledge; Virginia Ng; Paul Fletcher; John Brown; Steve C R Williams
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  14 in total

1.  Cholinergic blockade under working memory demands encountered by increased rehearsal strategies: evidence from fMRI in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Bianca Voss; Renate Thienel; Martina Reske; Thilo Kellermann; Abigail J Sheldrick; Sarah Halfter; Katrin Radenbach; Nadim J Shah; Ute Habel; Tilo T J Kircher
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cholinergic modulation of cognition: insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Dissociated mean and functional connectivity BOLD signals in visual cortex during eyes closed and fixation.

Authors:  Mark McAvoy; Linda Larson-Prior; Marek Ludwikow; Dongyang Zhang; Abraham Z Snyder; Debra L Gusnard; Marcus E Raichle; Giovanni d'Avossa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cholinergic enhancement reduces functional connectivity and BOLD variability in visual extrastriate cortex during selective attention.

Authors:  Emiliano Ricciardi; Giacomo Handjaras; Giulio Bernardi; Pietro Pietrini; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Amygdala response to explicit sad face stimuli at baseline predicts antidepressant treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanik; Allison C Nugent; Wayne C Drevets; Ashish Khanna; Carlos A Zarate; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.376

7.  Cholinergic modulation of visual working memory during aging: a parametric PET study.

Authors:  Emiliano Ricciardi; Pietro Pietrini; Mark B Schapiro; Stanley I Rapoport; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Potential of pretreatment neural activity in the visual cortex during emotional processing to predict treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Wayne C Drevets; Elana M Hoffman; Erica Frankel; Andrew M Speer; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  Effect of cholinergic neurotransmission modulation on visual spatial paired associate learning in healthy human adults.

Authors:  Brian T Harel; Robert H Pietrzak; Peter J Snyder; Paul Maruff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Effects of acetylcholine on neuronal properties in entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  James G Heys; Nathan W Schultheiss; Christopher F Shay; Yusuke Tsuno; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.