Literature DB >> 18281414

Shoot calcium and magnesium concentrations differ between subtaxa, are highly heritable, and associate with potentially pleiotropic loci in Brassica oleracea.

Martin R Broadley1, John P Hammond, Graham J King, Dave Astley, Helen C Bowen, Mark C Meacham, Andrew Mead, David A C Pink, Graham R Teakle, Rory M Hayden, William P Spracklen, Philip J White.   

Abstract

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are the most abundant group II elements in both plants and animals. Genetic variation in shoot Ca and shoot Mg concentration (shoot Ca and Mg) in plants can be exploited to biofortify food crops and thereby increase dietary Ca and Mg intake for humans and livestock. We present a comprehensive analysis of within-species genetic variation for shoot Ca and Mg, demonstrating that shoot mineral concentration differs significantly between subtaxa (varietas). We established a structured diversity foundation set of 376 accessions to capture a high proportion of species-wide allelic diversity within domesticated Brassica oleracea, including representation of wild relatives (C genome, 1n = 9) from natural populations. These accessions and 74 modern F(1) hybrid cultivars were grown in glasshouse and field environments. Shoot Ca and Mg varied 2- and 2.3-fold, respectively, and was typically not inversely correlated with shoot biomass, within most subtaxa. The closely related capitata (cabbage) and sabauda (Savoy cabbage) subtaxa consistently had the highest mean shoot Ca and Mg. Shoot Ca and Mg in glasshouse-grown plants was highly correlated with data from the field. To understand and dissect the genetic basis of variation in shoot Ca and Mg, we studied homozygous lines from a segregating B. oleracea mapping population. Shoot Ca and Mg was highly heritable (up to 40%). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for shoot Ca and Mg were detected on chromosomes C2, C6, C7, C8, and, in particular, C9, where QTL accounted for 14% to 55% of the total genetic variance. The presence of QTL on C9 was substantiated by scoring recurrent backcross substitution lines, derived from the same parents. This also greatly increased the map resolution, with strong evidence that a 4-cM region on C9 influences shoot Ca. This region corresponds to a 0.41-Mb region on Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) chromosome 5 that includes 106 genes. There is also evidence that pleiotropic loci on C8 and C9 affect shoot Ca and Mg. Map-based cloning of these loci will reveal how shoot-level phenotypes relate to Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) uptake and homeostasis at the molecular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18281414      PMCID: PMC2287345          DOI: 10.1104/pp.107.114645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  25 in total

1.  Phylogenetic variation in the shoot mineral concentration of angiosperms.

Authors:  Martin R Broadley; Helen C Bowen; Helen L Cotterill; John P Hammond; Mark C Meacham; Andrew Mead; Philip J White
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 2.  Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg.

Authors:  Orit Shaul
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.949

3.  Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants.

Authors:  Toshihiro Watanabe; Martin R Broadley; Steven Jansen; Philip J White; Jitsuya Takada; Kenichi Satake; Takejiro Takamatsu; Sehat Jaya Tuah; Mitsuru Osaki
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  QTL analysis: a simple 'marker-regression' approach.

Authors:  M J Kearsey; V Hyne
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  A sequence-tagged linkage map of Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Jung Sun Kim; Tae Young Chung; Graham J King; Mina Jin; Tae-Jin Yang; Yong-Moon Jin; Ho-Il Kim; Beom-Seok Park
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Identification of genetic factors controlling the efficiency of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation in Brassica oleracea by QTL analysis.

Authors:  I. Cogan; R. Lynn; J. King; J. Kearsey; J. Newbury; J. Puddephat
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 7.  Biofortification of UK food crops with selenium.

Authors:  Martin R Broadley; Philip J White; Rosie J Bryson; Mark C Meacham; Helen C Bowen; Sarah E Johnson; Malcolm J Hawkesford; Steve P McGrath; Fang-Jie Zhao; Neil Breward; Miles Harriman; Mark Tucker
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.297

8.  Identification and characterization of QTL controlling Agrobacterium-mediated transient and stable transformation of Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  Noel O I Cogan; H John Newbury; Angela M Oldacres; James R Lynn; Michael J Kearsey; Graham J King; Ian J Puddephat
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Breeding for micronutrients in staple food crops from a human nutrition perspective.

Authors:  Ross M Welch; Robin D Graham
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Alignment of the conserved C genomes of Brassica oleracea and Brassica napus.

Authors:  E J Bohuon; D J Keith; I A Parkin; A G Sharpe; D J Lydiate
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation?

Authors:  Carlos Alonso-Blanco; Mark G M Aarts; Leonie Bentsink; Joost J B Keurentjes; Matthieu Reymond; Dick Vreugdenhil; Maarten Koornneef
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Should we treat the ionome as a combination of individual elements, or should we be deriving novel combined traits?

Authors:  Ivan Baxter
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Distribution of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) in the leaves of Brassica rapa under varying exogenous Ca and Mg supply.

Authors:  Juan Jose Rios; Seosamh O Lochlainn; Jean Devonshire; Neil S Graham; John P Hammond; Graham J King; Philip J White; Smita Kurup; Martin R Broadley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Identification of a gene controlling variation in the salt tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.).

Authors:  Hui-Yee Yong; Chunlei Wang; Ian Bancroft; Feng Li; Xiaoming Wu; Hiroyasu Kitashiba; Takeshi Nishio
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Quantitative trait loci affecting seed mineral concentrations in Brassica napus grown with contrasting phosphorus supplies.

Authors:  Guangda Ding; Mei Yang; Yifan Hu; Yuan Liao; Lei Shi; Fangsen Xu; Jinling Meng
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Root development under control of magnesium availability.

Authors:  Yaofang Niu; Gulei Jin; Yong Song Zhang
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2014

7.  Natural genetic variation in selected populations of Arabidopsis thaliana is associated with ionomic differences.

Authors:  Elizabeth Buescher; Tilman Achberger; Idris Amusan; Anthony Giannini; Cherie Ochsenfeld; Ana Rus; Brett Lahner; Owen Hoekenga; Elena Yakubova; Jeffrey F Harper; Mary Lou Guerinot; Min Zhang; David E Salt; Ivan R Baxter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genetic analysis of potassium use efficiency in Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  P J White; J P Hammond; G J King; H C Bowen; R M Hayden; M C Meacham; W P Spracklen; M R Broadley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  Ionomics: studying the social network of mineral nutrients.

Authors:  Ivan Baxter
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 7.834

10.  Genetic dissection of the shoot and root ionomes of Brassica napus grown with contrasting phosphate supplies.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Guangda Ding; Philip J White; Meng Wang; Jun Zou; Fangsen Xu; John P Hammond; Lei Shi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.