Literature DB >> 12110765

Bone adaptation response to sham and bending stimuli in mice.

M P Akhter1, D M Cullen, R R Recker.   

Abstract

This study presents inbred-strain-related differences in tibial bone adaptation response to low-force loading in four-point bending and sham (pad pressure) arrangements in mice. Our previous work in mice has shown that at relatively high but equal bending forces (9 N or a bending moment of 16.88 N-mm), C57BL/6J mice respond with significantly greater bone formation than C3H/HeJ mice. Because of high tibial strains, the majority of the bone response in our previous study was woven bone. In this, study, we reduced the loading forces to 5 N or a bending moment of 9.38 N-mm (to decrease the woven-bone formation response) and investigated inbred-strain-related bone adaptation differences resulting from bending and sham loading (reported here for the first time in C57BL/6J) in these mice. Twenty-four female mice within each inbred mouse strain (C3H/HeJ [C3H] and C57BL/6J [B6]) were randomly divided into the two loading groups (12 per group sham and bending, total of 48 mice). All of the external loading was done for 36 cycles at 2 Hz, 3 d/wk for 3 wk. The bone adaptation response at lower forces exhibited a pattern similar to that seen for the higher forces in the previous study, suggesting that the patterns of bone adaptation were inbred strain related and independent of bending force magnitude. The bending-related periosteal mineral apposition surface (pMS) and mineral apposition rate (MAR) were respectively 40% and 45% greater in B6 than in C3H. The cortical bone adaptation response to bending was greater when compared to sham or pad pressure for each inbred strain of mice, suggesting that the majority of the bone adaptation response was the result of bending stimulus and not local pressure from pad contact. In addition, regardless of loading arrangement (sham or bending), the bone adaptation response in C57BL/6J mice was greater than C3H/HeJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12110765     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:5:2:207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fluoride's effects on the formation of teeth and bones, and the influence of genetics.

Authors:  E T Everett
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Activation of Wnt Signaling by Mechanical Loading Is Impaired in the Bone of Old Mice.

Authors:  Nilsson Holguin; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion.

Authors:  Qing-Yuan Guo; Shi-jie Zhang; Hong Liu; Chun-ling Wang; Fu-lan Wei; Tao Lv; Na-na Wang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Comparing histological, vascular and molecular responses associated with woven and lamellar bone formation induced by mechanical loading in the rat ulna.

Authors:  Jennifer A McKenzie; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Mechanical stimulation of bone formation is normal in the SAMP6 mouse.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Michael D Brodt
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Insulin, fat, and bone: multiple interactions lead to complex biology.

Authors:  Robert D Blank
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  Bone fragility and decline in stem cells in prematurely aging DNA repair deficient trichothiodystrophy mice.

Authors:  Karin E M Diderich; Claudia Nicolaije; Matthias Priemel; Jan H Waarsing; Judd S Day; Renata M C Brandt; Arndt F Schilling; Sander M Botter; Harrie Weinans; Gijsbertus T J van der Horst; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Johannes P T M van Leeuwen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-08-04

9.  Aged mice have enhanced endocortical response and normal periosteal response compared with young-adult mice following 1 week of axial tibial compression.

Authors:  Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Trabecular and Cortical Bone of Growing C3H Mice Is Highly Responsive to the Removal of Weightbearing.

Authors:  Bing Li; Jeyantt Srinivas Sankaran; Stefan Judex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.