Literature DB >> 18279907

Deciding what to see: the role of intention and attention in the perception of apparent motion.

Axel Kohler1, Leila Haddad, Wolf Singer, Lars Muckli.   

Abstract

Apparent motion is an illusory perception of movement that can be induced by alternating presentations of static objects. Already in Wertheimer's early investigation of the phenomenon [Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 61, 161-265], he mentions that voluntary attention can influence the way in which an ambiguous apparent motion display is perceived. But until now, few studies have investigated how strong the modulation of apparent motion through attention can be under different stimulus and task conditions. We used bistable motion quartets of two different sizes, where the perception of vertical and horizontal motion is equally likely. Eleven observers participated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to either (a) hold the current movement direction as long as possible, (b) passively view the stimulus, or (c) switch the movement directions as quickly as possible. With the respective instructions, observers could almost double phase durations in (a) and more than halve durations in (c) relative to the passive condition. This modulation effect was stronger for the large quartets. In Experiment 2, observers' attention was diverted from the stimulus by a detection task at fixation while they still had to report their conscious perception. This manipulation prolonged dominance durations for up to 100%. The experiments reveal a high susceptibility of ambiguous apparent motion to attentional modulation. We discuss how feature- and space-based attention mechanisms might contribute to those effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18279907     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Neural processes for intentional control of perceptual switching: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Masanori Shimono; Keiichi Kitajo; Tsunehiro Takeda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Curved apparent motion induced by amodal completion.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Kim; Jacob Feldman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Subjective control of polystable illusory apparent motion: Is control possible when the stimulus affords countless motion possibilities?

Authors:  Allison K Allen; Matthew T Jacobs; Nicolas Davidenko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Attentional influences on the dynamics of motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Marieke L Schölvinck; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Laila Hugrass; David Crewther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The advantage of ambiguity? Enhanced neural responses to multi-stable percepts correlate with the degree of perceived instability.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Transfer of predictive signals across saccades.

Authors:  Petra Vetter; Grace Edwards; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-08

Review 9.  Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Visual working memory contents bias ambiguous structure from motion perception.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.