Literature DB >> 19271908

Attentional influences on the dynamics of motion-induced blindness.

Marieke L Schölvinck1, Geraint Rees.   

Abstract

Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is a visual phenomenon in which a highly salient, peripheral, visual target spontaneously disappears from visual awareness (and subsequently reappears) when superimposed on a globally moving background of distracters. Here, we investigated the influence of attention on these fluctuations in perception in two experiments. In the first experiment, directing spatial attention to the MIB target (and thus away from the distracters) led to an increased probability of disappearance of the target. This counter-intuitive effect of attention enhancing disappearance is nonetheless consistent with earlier reports that increased target salience enhances disappearance. Conversely, in a second experiment withdrawing attention from the entire MIB display (both target and distracters) led to a decrease in perceptual disappearances and reappearances, as well as prolonged periods of invisibility. Taken together these findings suggest that the global availability of attention facilitates competition between target and moving distracters, while the local direction of attention toward or away from the target can influence the outcome of that competition. Thus, in common with other related perceptual phenomena, attention has complex effects on the dynamics of target-distracter interactions associated with motion-induced blindness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271908      PMCID: PMC2654968          DOI: 10.1167/9.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  30 in total

1.  Motion-induced blindness in normal observers.

Authors:  Y S Bonneh; A Cooperman; D Sagi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion.

Authors:  Erich W Graf; Wendy J Adams; Martin Lages
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Components of visual prior entry.

Authors:  Keith A Schneider; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion.

Authors:  Karel Hol; Ansgar Koene; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

6.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  Li-Chuan Hsu; Su-Ling Yeh; Peter Kramer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task.

Authors:  G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words.

Authors:  G Rees; C Russell; C D Frith; J Driver
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Neural correlates of perceptual completion of an artificial scotoma in human visual cortex measured using functional MRI.

Authors:  R S Weil; S Watkins; G Rees
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Retinotopic patterns of correlated fluctuations in visual cortex reflect the dynamics of spontaneous perceptual suppression.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Yoram S Bonneh; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural correlates of motion-induced blindness in the human brain.

Authors:  Marieke L Schölvinck; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Growing evidence for separate neural mechanisms for attention and consciousness.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Consciousness and attention: on sufficiency and necessity.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-20

Review 6.  A new taxonomy for perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  Rimona S Weil; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2010-11-05

7.  Attention as a process of selection, perception as a process of representation, and phenomenal experience as the resulting process of perception being modulated by a dedicated consciousness mechanism.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-29

8.  Against the View that Consciousness and Attention are Fully Dissociable.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-15

9.  Opposite effects of perceptual and working memory load on perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma.

Authors:  Rimona S Weil; Victoria Wykes; David Carmel; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.065

10.  Reduced alpha amplitudes predict perceptual suppression.

Authors:  Eva Poland; Aishwarya Bhonsle; Iris Steinmann; Melanie Wilke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.