Literature DB >> 18279476

Assessment of antitussive efficacy of dextromethorphan in smoking related cough: objective vs. subjective measures.

James Ramsay1, Caroline Wright, Rachel Thompson, David Hull, Alyn H Morice.   

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Dextromethorphan is widely used as a cough suppressant in over the counter medications. Its efficacy in altering cough reflex sensitivity has been shown in healthy volunteers. In contrast evidence for an effect on clinically important cough is poor. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: A significant decrease in evoked cough was seen with dextromethorphan compared with placebo. However, both placebo and active treatment improved subjective data to a similar degree. We doubt the validity of currently used objective tests in the investigation of antitussives. AIMS: Using an established model of smokers cough we measured the antitussive effects of dextromethorphan compared with placebo.
METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled, crossover comparison of 22 mg 0.8 ml(-1) dextromethorphan delivered pregastrically with matched placebo. Objective and subjective measurements of cough were recorded. Subjective measures included a daily diary record of cough symptoms and the Leicester quality of life questionnaire. Cough frequency was recorded using a manual cough counter. The objective measure of cough reflex sensitivity was the citric acid, dose-response cough challenge.
RESULTS: Dextromethorphan was significantly associated with an increase in the concentration of citric acid eliciting an average of two coughs/inhalation (C2) when compared with placebo, 1 h post dose by 0.49 mM (95% CI 0.05, 0.45, geometric mean 3.09) compared with placebo 0.24 mM (geometric mean 1.74) P < 0.05 and at 2 h 0.57 mM (95% CI 0.01, 0.43, geometric mean 3.75) compared with placebo 0.34 mM (geometric mean 2.19) P < 0.05). There was a highly significant improvement in the subjective data when compared with baseline. However, there was no significant difference between placebo and active treatment. No correlation was seen between cough sensitivity to citric acid and recorded cough counts or symptoms. When both subjective and objective data were compared with screening data there was evidence of a marked 'placebo' effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The objective measure of cough sensitivity demonstrates dextromethorphan effectively diminishes the cough reflex sensitivity. However, subjective measures do not support this. Other studies support these findings, which may represent a profound sensitivity of the cough reflex to higher influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18279476      PMCID: PMC2432485          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cough challenge in the assessment of cough reflex.

Authors:  A H Morice; J A Kastelik; R Thompson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The placebo response to citric acid-induced cough: pharmacodynamics and gender differences.

Authors:  A Rostami-Hodjegan; R Abdul-Manap; C E Wright; G T Tucker; A H Morice
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.410

3.  Effect of codeine on objective measurement of cough in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Jaclyn Smith; Emily Owen; John Earis; Ashley Woodcock
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 4.  The powerful placebo in cough studies?

Authors:  R Eccles
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.410

5.  Citric acid-induced cough thresholds in normal subjects, patients with bronchial asthma, and smokers.

Authors:  D Schmidt; R A Jörres; H Magnussen
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  1997-09-29       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  The crossover experiment for clinical trials.

Authors:  B W Brown
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ).

Authors:  S S Birring; B Prudon; A J Carr; S J Singh; M D L Morgan; I D Pavord
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  The antitussive effect of dextromethorphan in relation to CYP2D6 activity.

Authors:  R Abdul Manap; C E Wright; A Gregory; A Rostami-Hodjegan; S T Meller; G R Kelm; M S Lennard; G T Tucker; A H Morice
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Assessment of the antitussive efficacy of codeine in cough associated with common cold.

Authors:  C Freestone; R Eccles
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.765

10.  Effect of salbutamol on smoking related cough.

Authors:  Siobhan Mulrennan; Caroline Wright; Rachel Thompson; Peter Goustas; Alyn Morice
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.410

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cough: an unmet clinical need.

Authors:  Peter V Dicpinigaitis
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Pharmacologic management of cough.

Authors:  Donald C Bolser
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Looking back: editors' pick of 2008.

Authors:  Y K Loke; A Somogyi; L D Lewis; M Schachter; A F Cohen; J M Ritter
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The placebo effect: plugging the nostrils of unmet needs.

Authors:  James N Baraniuk
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  A randomized placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effects of butamirate and dextromethorphan on capsaicin induced cough in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Shoaib Faruqi; Caroline Wright; Rachel Thompson; Alyn H Morice
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Is opiate action in cough due to sedation?

Authors:  Rebecca S Dickinson; Jaymin B Morjaria; Caroline E Wright; Alyn H Morice
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Tools for assessing outcomes in studies of chronic cough: CHEST guideline and expert panel report.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Boulet; Remy R Coeytaux; Douglas C McCrory; Cynthia T French; Anne B Chang; Surinder S Birring; Jaclyn Smith; Rebecca L Diekemper; Bruce Rubin; Richard S Irwin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.410

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.