Literature DB >> 12099783

The powerful placebo in cough studies?

R Eccles1.   

Abstract

Placebo treatment has been reported to improve subjective and objective measures of disease in up to 30-40% of patients with a wide range of clinical conditions. A review of 8 clinical trials on the effects of antitussive medicines on cough associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection shows that 85% of the reduction in cough is related to treatment with placebo, and only 15% attributable to the active ingredient Treatment with a cough medicine can be viewed as consisting of three components: pharmacological, physiological (demulcent) and placebo. The placebo effect is related to belief in the effectiveness of the treatment and this idea must in some way influence the central control of cough. Studies on the placebo effect of analgesics indicate that the placebo effect may be mediated by endogenous opioid neurotransmitters and this may explain the analgesic potency of opioid medicines such as morphine. In the present paper a model is proposed to explain the antitussive effects of placebo treatment on the basis of endogenous opioid neurotransmitters. With active pharmacological ingredients contributing only 15% to the effects of cough treatment it seems reasonable to conduct more research on the other components of treatment such as placebo. Copyright 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12099783     DOI: 10.1006/pupt.2002.0364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1094-5539            Impact factor:   3.410


  32 in total

Review 1.  Applying evidence to support ethical decisions: is the placebo really powerless?.

Authors:  Franz Porzsolt; Nicole Schlotz-Gorton; Nikola Biller-Andorno; Anke Thim; Karin Meissner; Irmgard Roeckl-Wiedmann; Barbara Herzberger; Renatus Ziegler; Wilhelm Gaus; Ernst Pöppe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  On the psychology of cough.

Authors:  Omer Van den Bergh; Ilse Van Diest; Lieven Dupont; Paul W Davenport
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Encoding of the cough reflex in anesthetized guinea pigs.

Authors:  Brendan J Canning; Nanako Mori
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Scintigraphy in laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a definitive diagnostic test?

Authors:  Gregory L Falk; John Beattie; Alvin Ing; S E Falk; Michael Magee; Leticia Burton; Hans Van der Wall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  New developments in the objective assessment of cough.

Authors:  Jaclyn Smith; Ashley Woodcock
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 6.  Effect of taste sensation on cough reflex sensitivity.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Paul A S Breslin; Pamela Dalton
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.584

7.  Importance of placebo effect in cough clinical trials.

Authors:  Ron Eccles
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.584

8.  The placebo effect: plugging the nostrils of unmet needs.

Authors:  James N Baraniuk
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Validation of the ERS standard citric acid cough challenge in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Caroline E Wright; Jennifer Jackson; Rachel L Thompson; Alyn H Morice
Journal:  Cough       Date:  2010-08-10

10.  Assessment of antitussive efficacy of dextromethorphan in smoking related cough: objective vs. subjective measures.

Authors:  James Ramsay; Caroline Wright; Rachel Thompson; David Hull; Alyn H Morice
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.