Literature DB >> 1827829

Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments.

W A Johnston1, K J Hawley, J M Elliott.   

Abstract

Following a shallow (count vowels) or deep (read) study task, old and new words were tested for both fluency of perception and recognition memory. Subjects first identified a test word as it came gradually into view and then judged it as old or new. Old words were identified faster than new words, indicating implicit, perceptual memory for old words. Independently of this effect, words judged old were identified faster than words judged new, especially after shallow study. Eight experiments examined the possible causal relationship between perceptual fluency and recognition judgements. Experiments 1 to 4 showed that fast identifications per se do not promote old judgments. Accelerating the identification of test items by semantically priming them or making them come more quickly into view did not affect recognition judgments. Experiment 5 showed that the usual association of fast identifications with old judgments is not an artifact of item selection because the association disappeared when the identifications and judgements were segregated into different phases of the test task. Experiments 6 and 7 showed tha the likelihood of old judgments increases directly with the pretested perceptibility of test words, but only after shallow study. Experiment 8 showed that the dependency of recognition judgments on perceptual fluency continues to hold when the requirement to identify the words before judging them is eliminated. We conclude that fluency of perception contributes to recognition judgments, but only when the fluency is produced naturally (e.g., through perceptual memory) and explicit memory is minimal.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1827829     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.2.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  The marriage of perception and memory: creating two-way illusions with words and voices.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; H M Kleider; E Shelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  Relaxing decision criteria does not improve recognition memory in amnesic patients.

Authors:  P J Reber; L R Squire
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition.

Authors:  Deanne L Westerman; Jeremy K Miller; Marianne E Lloyd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

5.  Recognition without awareness: an elusive phenomenon.

Authors:  Annette Jeneson; C Brock Kirwan; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

7.  Increasing the salience of fluency cues reduces the recognition memory impairment in amnesia.

Authors:  Margaret M Keane; Frances Orlando; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  False recognition across meaning, language, and stimulus format: conceptual relatedness and the feeling of familiarity.

Authors:  Tedra Fazendeiro; Piotr Winkielman; Chun Luo; Christopher Lorah
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

9.  Can tutoring improve performance on a reasoning task under deadline conditions?

Authors:  Magda Osman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

10.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Carol L Baym; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.