Literature DB >> 25737663

Modern instrumentation of the pediatric occiput and upper cervical spine: review article.

Daniel Hedequist1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rigid screw rod techniques for cervical stabilization are widely used in adults. The benefits of rigid internal fixation include increased fusion rates, improvements in deformity correction, and diminished immobilization requirements. Applications of these techniques in children are challenging due to size constraints and the pathologic conditions encountered which require instrumented cervical fusions. Preparation as well as thorough understanding of the anatomy and surgical techniques is paramount to surgical safety in pediatric patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This review article serves as an educational tool regarding the use of modern posterior instrumentation techniques for pediatric cervical deformity.
METHODS: Expert review based on clinical expertise and literature review.
RESULTS: The use of rigid screw rod instrumentation for the pediatric occiput and upper cervical spine is discussed. Preoperative imaging requirements for pediatric patients undergoing cervical spine surgery are reviewed. Anatomy, morphologic studies, and surgical techniques are discussed for each area of instrumentation.
CONCLUSIONS: Modern posterior cervical instrumentation techniques can be safely applied to the majority of pediatric patients who require an instrumented posterior cervical fusion. Patient safety revolves around thorough preoperative imaging tests, understanding of upper cervical anatomy, and meticulous surgical technique. Modern instrumentation leads to an improvement in fusion rates and a diminishment in immobilization requirements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical spine; pediatric; screw fixation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25737663      PMCID: PMC4342396          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-014-9398-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  24 in total

1.  Single stage reduction and stabilization of basilar invagination after failed prior fusion surgery in children with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Hedequist; Kimon Bekelis; John Emans; Mark R Proctor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Incorporation of C-1 lateral mass screws in occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fusions for children 8 years of age or younger. Technical note.

Authors:  Andrew Jea; Michael D Taylor; Peter B Dirks; Abhaya V Kulkarni; James T Rutka; James M Drake
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Occipital morphology. An anatomic guide to internal fixation.

Authors:  R I Zipnick; A A Merola; J Gorup; K Kunkle; T Shin; S A Caruso; T R Haher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Occipital screw pullout strength. A biomechanical investigation of occipital morphology.

Authors:  T R Haher; A W Yeung; S A Caruso; A A Merola; T Shin; R I Zipnick; J M Gorup; C Bono
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Anatomical suitability of C1-2 transarticular screw placement in pediatric patients.

Authors:  D L Brockmeyer; J E York; R I Apfelbaum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: a review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 67 pediatric patients.

Authors:  Wayne M Gluf; Douglas L Brockmeyer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-02

7.  Routine sectioning of the C2 nerve root and ganglion for C1 lateral mass screw placement in children: surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Akash J Patel; Loyola V Gressot; Jerome Boatey; Steven W Hwang; Alison Brayton; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Modern cervical spine instrumentation in children.

Authors:  Daniel Hedequist; Timothy Hresko; Mark Proctor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Selection of a rigid internal fixation construct for stabilization at the craniovertebral junction in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Richard C E Anderson; Brian T Ragel; J Mocco; Leif-Erik Bohman; Douglas L Brockmeyer
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2-6.

Authors:  Matthew J Geck; Eeric Truumees; Dana Hawthorne; Devender Singh; John K Stokes; Amy Flynn
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2014-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Complications of occipitocervical fixation: retrospective review of 128 patients with 5-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Nevhis Akıntürk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Pediatric Upper Cervical Spine Trauma: A 10-Year Retrospective Review at a Pediatric Trauma Center.

Authors:  Sazid Hasan; Muhammad Waheed; Ameen K Suhrawardy; Collin Braithwaite; Lamia Ahmed; Philip Zakko; Jad G Khalil; Ehab S Saleh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.