Literature DB >> 18276043

Poor agreement between a portable armband and indirect calorimetry in the assessment of resting energy expenditure.

S Bertoli1, A Posata, A Battezzati, A Spadafranca, G Testolin, G Bedogni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To evaluate the agreement between resting energy expenditure (REE) estimated by a portable armband and measured by indirect calorimetry.
METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-seven women and 42 men with a mean (SD) age of 44 (12) years and a body mass index of 30.2 (5.4) kg/m(2) were studied. REE was estimated using the Sense Wear Pro 2 Armband (SWA), measured using the Sensor Medics 29 metabolic cart (V(max)), and estimated using Schofield's equation. The limits of agreement (LOA) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to evaluate the interchangeability of the methods.
RESULTS: The LOA between REE(SWA) and REE(Vmax) were wide in both women (-269 to 378 kcal/day) and men (-330 to 545 kcal/day) and CCC was low (0.579 in females and 0.583 in males, p<0.0001 for both). REE(Schofield) agreed with REE(Vmax) to a similar degree (CCC=0.563 in females and 0.500 in males, p<0.0001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: SWA and indirect calorimetry are not interchangeable methods for the assessment of REE in normal-weight and obese subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18276043     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  7 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of body composition as a surrogate evaluation of energy balance in obese patients.

Authors:  Carlo Maria Rotella; Ilaria Dicembrini
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-03-26

2.  Evaluation of a non-invasive multisensor accelerometer for calculating energy expenditure in ventilated intensive care patients compared to indirect calorimetry and predictive equations.

Authors:  Janine Krüger; Matthias Kraft; Matthias Gründling; Sigrun Friesecke; Simone Gärtner; Lena J Vogt; Nicole Schüler; Antje Steveling; Markus M Lerch; Ali A Aghdassi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Validity of Accelerometers for the Evaluation of Energy Expenditure in Obese and Overweight Individuals: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Silvia Pisanu; Andrea Deledda; Andrea Loviselli; Inge Huybrechts; Fernanda Velluzzi
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2020-08-04

4.  Physical activity after surgically obtained weight loss: study with a SenseWear armband in subjects undergoing biliopancreatic diversion.

Authors:  Raffaella Gradaschi; Giovanni Camerini; Flavia Carlini; Samyr Sukkar; Nicola Sopinaro; Gian Franco Adami
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  [Postoperative assessment of daily energy expenditure. Comparison of two methods].

Authors:  R Dummler; A Zittermann; M Schäfer; M Emmerich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Energy expenditure evaluation in humans and non-human primates by SenseWear Armband. Validation of energy expenditure evaluation by SenseWear Armband by direct comparison with indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  Francesca Casiraghi; Raweewan Lertwattanarak; Livio Luzi; Alberto O Chavez; Alberto M Davalli; Terry Naegelin; Anthony G Comuzzie; Patricia Frost; Nicolas Musi; Franco Folli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A robust permutation test for the concordance correlation coefficient.

Authors:  Alan D Hutson; Han Yu
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.